Control: tags -1 +pending
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 11:04:32AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Note that since dpkg 1.18.11, dpkg-buildpackage defaults to setting -Jauto,
> which means automatically passing parallel=64 (on that machine),
> which in turns sets MAKEFLAGS to -j64 in debian/rules,
>
On 20/12/16 at 20:21 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 06:16:59PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > It seems to be a random issue. Apparently I was unlucky as it failed
> > twice in a row for me (when doing archive rebuilds, I automatically
> > retry failed builds once to avoid
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 06:16:59PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> It seems to be a random issue. Apparently I was unlucky as it failed
> twice in a row for me (when doing archive rebuilds, I automatically
> retry failed builds once to avoid random issues).
>
> Doing:
> for i in $(seq 0 9); do su
Hi Olly,
On 20/12/16 at 01:24 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 +unreproducible
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:12:01PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
>
> I've just
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 +unreproducible
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:12:01PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
I've just tried to reproduce locally with "sbuild -dunstable xapian-bindings"
and
Source: xapian-bindings
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161219 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
