El 13/12/17 a las 06:43, intrigeri escribió:
> Santiago R.R.:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:50:15 +0100 intrigeri wrote:
> >> santiag...@riseup.net:
> >> > I am not expert on writing systemd units, and I am unable to play with
> >> > this soon. So it would be great if you could
Santiago R.R.:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:50:15 +0100 intrigeri wrote:
>> santiag...@riseup.net:
>> > I am not expert on writing systemd units, and I am unable to play with
>> > this soon. So it would be great if you could propose a patch :-)
>>
>> Sure. I might do it once I
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:50:15 +0100 intrigeri wrote:
> santiag...@riseup.net:
> > I am not expert on writing systemd units, and I am unable to play with
> > this soon. So it would be great if you could propose a patch :-)
>
> Sure. I might do it once I start using paxrat on
santiag...@riseup.net:
> I am not expert on writing systemd units, and I am unable to play with
> this soon. So it would be great if you could propose a patch :-)
Sure. I might do it once I start using paxrat on systems without
live-config (but paxrat is less needed on those systems, so perhaps
Hi!
El 01/01/17 a las 18:48, intrig...@debian.org escribió:
…
>
> It's great that there's APT integration to take care of the package
> installation and upgrade issue, but how about the first time one
> reboots into their PaX-enabled kernel? Likely they won't have run
> paxrat manually yet, so
Package: paxrat
Severity: wishlist
Version: 1.0-2
User: tails-...@boum.org
Usertags: hardening
Hi,
It's great that there's APT integration to take care of the package
installation and upgrade issue, but how about the first time one
reboots into their PaX-enabled kernel? Likely they won't have
6 matches
Mail list logo