Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:07:34PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > I've putted the current changes back to [1]. > > I would appreciate your advice about my debian/rules. What can I improve it? > > [1] > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/t/telegram-desktop/telegram-desktop_1.0.0-1.dsc

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-20 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:46:46PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "telegram-desktop" > > * Package name: telegram-desktop >Version : 1.0.0-2~rc2 >Upstream Author : John Preston > * URL :

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello >This is alpha version. It is not in upstream changelog on [1]. something I wondered too, maybe tagging it differently from official releases might help >To be noted upstream author does not always publish the tags in time. > >P.S.: I don't know how to put this remote changelog into the

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-18 Thread Коля Гурьев
19.01.2017 00:23, Gianfranco Costamagna пишет: I see tag for 1.0.1 pushed on github [1] This is alpha version. It is not in upstream changelog on [1]. To be noted upstream author does not always publish the tags in time. P.S.: I don't know how to put this remote changelog into the package.

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-18 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello >Version : 1.0.0-2~rc2 >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/t/telegram-desktop/telegram-desktop_1.0.0-2~rc2.dsc I see tag for 1.0.1 pushed on github [1] Isn't it a good release? I didn't look at the code, but instead of an rc, I would prefer a stable 1.0.1 (even

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:07:34PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > > Why is it in contrib? > From what I understand, there are packages with dependencies on non-free > software in contrib section. This program does not work if Telegram server > is stopped for any reason. But this server is

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-18 Thread Коля Гурьев
I already fixed a few things: debian/changelog, the list of build dependencies. My fork on Github is specified temporally in debian/control. I just don't know a more appropriate value for this field at the moment. I've putted the current changes back to [1]. I would appreciate your advice

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Why is it in contrib? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:46:46PM +0300, Коля Гурьев wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "telegram-desktop" Hi! I am an heavy user of telegram, and I was looking forward for this package, despite the privacy concerns, etc. >

Bug#851756: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.0-2

2017-01-18 Thread Коля Гурьев
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "telegram-desktop" * Package name: telegram-desktop Version : 1.0.0-2~rc2 Upstream Author : John Preston * URL :