Hello Julien,
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 11:07:43AM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
>
> > It seems extremely late to be making this change and be confident we're
> > not breaking the world. 3 or 4 months ago would have been more
> > feasible.
>
>
Julien Cristau writes:
> It seems extremely late to be making this change and be confident we're
> not breaking the world. 3 or 4 months ago would have been more
> feasible.
Certainly my preference as well, but we weren't able to stabilize
emacs25 until fairly recently[1].
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 23:15:48 -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> We want to remove emacs24 from stretch, and we think we've managed to
> fix all of the affected packages[1]. We're consulting you because we
> thought this might be considered a transition, though
Jiri Palecek writes:
> I noticed you are pursuing a switch from emacs24 to emacs25 in debian,
> however, there are still packages that need to be updated not to
> require specifically emacs24 which aren't on your list of packages
> needing update and reverse-dependencies.
Well
Hello Jiri,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 02:50:17PM +0100, Jiri Palecek wrote:
> I noticed you are pursuing a switch from emacs24 to emacs25 in debian,
> however, there are still packages that need to be updated not to
> require specifically emacs24 which aren't on your list of packages
> needing
Hello,
I noticed you are pursuing a switch from emacs24 to emacs25 in debian,
however, there are still packages that need to be updated not to require
specifically emacs24 which aren't on your list of packages needing update and
reverse-dependencies.
Particularly, these are
icicles
D:
Package: release.debian.org
We want to remove emacs24 from stretch, and we think we've managed to
fix all of the affected packages[1]. We're consulting you because we
thought this might be considered a transition, though perhaps a minor
one relative to others.
At this point, we believe we only
7 matches
Mail list logo