On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 01:41:26PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:07:54PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:37:28PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > If you want to work together you have to have a discussion. I appreciate
> > > the bug
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:07:54PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:37:28PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > If you want to work together you have to have a discussion. I appreciate
> > the bug has been languishing without a response but it pre-dates my
> > involvement
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:37:28PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> If you want to work together you have to have a discussion. I appreciate
> the bug has been languishing without a response but it pre-dates my
> involvement with the OpenOCD package and it's not been as high priority
> as
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:13:10PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > I'm not sure that's entirely appropriate. You can perfectly easily add
> > some udev rules to urjtag, rather than expecting openocd to solve the
> > problem for you. It can even be done in a way that means the 2 packages
> > can
> I'm not sure that's entirely appropriate. You can perfectly easily add
> some udev rules to urjtag, rather than expecting openocd to solve the
> problem for you. It can even be done in a way that means the 2 packages
> can co-exist. #852856 is a wishlist bug that essentially says "we do the
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
