Hi,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 02:46:27PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:13:07PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > > /usr/share/doc/libreoffice/sdk would also be possible AFAICS since it's
> > > no symlink and has (afaicr) never been used for the docs.
> >
> >
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:13:07PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > /usr/share/doc/libreoffice/sdk would also be possible AFAICS since it's
> > no symlink and has (afaicr) never been used for the docs.
>
> That would work as well ...
Unfortunately not:
In a chroot with jessie and apt-get
On 2017-02-12 11:17, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> So, yes, shipping directly in /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-core/sdk should do
>> the trick
>
> Changing the complete path during a hard freeze? Hmm.
Yes. Installing stuff over symlinks deserves RC status since it creates
subtle problems like this one
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:45:01PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> So you are installing something over an existing symlink in stretch ...
Yeah, I know.
> ==> Please make libreoffice-dev-doc ship its content in
> /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-core/sdk instead of
>
Hi,
in stretch, if I
apt-get install --install-recommends libreoffice-dev-doc
I get
# ls -la /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dev-doc
total 76
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 100 Feb 11 20:11 .
drwxr-xr-x 529 root root 11420 Feb 11 20:11 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root27 Jan 12 06:57 api ->
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 04:16:54PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> The last time this mess came up was #804317 which changed the path. And you
> as the reporter didn't react to the report...
>
> Policy 12.3 says that the docs in /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dev is preffered:
>
> "Additional
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
> 'jessie'.
> It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'stretch' fails.
>
> Reproducible on both amd64 and i386, needs --install-recommends
7 matches
Mail list logo
