Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 26.02.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > I've seen this problem a lot with libx* libraries. > Take libx11-dev: It started off with a 1: epoch and had that bumped to 2: as of 1.0.0-1 Yet I find consolekit: libx11-dev (>= 1.0.0) diodon: libx11-dev (>= 1.3.2) gnome-chemistry-utils:

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Jonathan Am 26.02.2017 um 18:04 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:25:17PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: >> On 02/20/2017 12:15 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >>> I specifically asked you not to use a "really" version. I don't mind so >>> much for sid, but

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:25:17PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > On 02/20/2017 12:15 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > I specifically asked you not to use a "really" version. I don't mind so > > much for sid, but it's really nasty for targeting a release. > > I'm sorry. > > Jonathan,

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-20 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
On 02/20/2017 12:15 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > I specifically asked you not to use a "really" version. I don't mind so > much for sid, but it's really nasty for targeting a release. I'm sorry. Jonathan, if I violated some policy, please point it out to me and I'll respond *immediately*. I

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-20 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 20.02.2017 um 12:15 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: > Hi, > > On 2017-02-17 20:26, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: >> I've NMUed shotwell 0.25.4+really0.24.5-0.1, containing 0.24.5, the >> latest stable release. It's now three days old. > > I specifically asked you not to use a "really" version. I

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-20 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, On 2017-02-17 20:26, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: I've NMUed shotwell 0.25.4+really0.24.5-0.1, containing 0.24.5, the latest stable release. It's now three days old. I specifically asked you not to use a "really" version. I don't mind so much for sid, but it's really nasty for targeting a

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-17 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
I've NMUed shotwell 0.25.4+really0.24.5-0.1, containing 0.24.5, the latest stable release. It's now three days old. How to proceed? -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-14 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:52:42PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > Please unblock package shotwell. > > Upstream version 0.25.1 of shotwell was packaged for testing, but that > version is unsuitable for release in stretch as it contained tons of > temporary

Bug#854912: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1

2017-02-11 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
Subject: unblock: shotwell/0.25.4-0.1 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package shotwell. Upstream version 0.25.1 of shotwell was packaged for testing, but that version is unsuitable for release in stretch