Bug#855198: Fwd: Bug#855198: Adding i386 support

2019-05-26 Thread David Bremner
Ignacio Losiggio writes: >>Why is an i386 package only usable if compiled with sse2 instructions? >>If you are targeting post-2003 computers, why aren't you using an amd64 >>build anyway? > > Lots of x86_64 machines run x86 systems due to low RAM availability, they > are 2010 Atom netbooks, etc.

Bug#855198: Fwd: Bug#855198: Adding i386 support

2018-03-08 Thread Ignacio Losiggio
>Why is an i386 package only usable if compiled with sse2 instructions? >If you are targeting post-2003 computers, why aren't you using an amd64 >build anyway? Lots of x86_64 machines run x86 systems due to low RAM availability, they are 2010 Atom netbooks, etc. For the low RAM ones i think that

Bug#855198: Adding i386 support

2018-03-07 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 11:58 -0300 schrieb Ignacio Losiggio: > I know that not _every_ x86 machine has sse2 support but i think that > having a usable package for those who use x86 on post-2003 computers Why is an i386 package only usable if compiled with sse2 instructions? If you are

Bug#855198: Adding i386 support

2018-03-07 Thread Ignacio Losiggio
Hi, i've compiled this package and it's libs for i386 adding -msse2 to both CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in the debian/rules file. I know that not _every_ x86 machine has sse2 support but i think that having a usable package for those who use x86 on post-2003 computers is advantageous. I could provide my