Bug#863455: firefoxdriver: switch to geckodriver?

2018-10-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2018-10-16 at 11:07 +0200, Sascha Girrulat wrote: > To build everything from the source it has to build from the main > repository. But that's really a muddled bunch of binary stuff and > it's not clear if it's possible to build it from source without > breaking the DFSG. It would be

Bug#863455: firefoxdriver: switch to geckodriver?

2018-10-16 Thread Sascha Girrulat
beside that the xpi contains some xpt files which are not reproducible. Cheers Sascha On 16.10.18 11:07, Sascha Girrulat wrote: > Hi, > > On 13.10.18 03:07, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:23 +0200, Sascha Girrulat wrote: >> >>> The non-free stuff contains only the webdriver

Bug#863455: firefoxdriver: switch to geckodriver?

2018-10-16 Thread Sascha Girrulat
Hi, On 13.10.18 03:07, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:23 +0200, Sascha Girrulat wrote: > >> The non-free stuff contains only the webdriver extension. > > So once geckodriver is packaged, Selenium will work with Firefox via > geckodriver instead of firefoxdriver and the only

Bug#863455: firefoxdriver: switch to geckodriver?

2018-10-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:23 +0200, Sascha Girrulat wrote: > The non-free stuff contains only the webdriver extension. So once geckodriver is packaged, Selenium will work with Firefox via geckodriver instead of firefoxdriver and the only consequence of not having firefoxdriver is that WebDriver

Bug#863455: firefoxdriver: switch to geckodriver?

2018-10-12 Thread Sascha Girrulat
Hi Paul, On 12.10.18 01:44, Paul Wise wrote: > It sounds like you are saying that Selenium cannot work with Firefox > without the non-free firefoxdriver stuff even if geckodriver is > available, is that true? It would be nice if Mozilla fixed this. no, it's not needed. Only the geckodriver is

Bug#863455: firefoxdriver: switch to geckodriver?

2018-10-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 20:00 +0200, Sascha Girrulat wrote: > we will try to integrate the geckodriver in the near future. But this > will not result in a removal of the firefoxdriver because the > geckodriver is needed by this package too. The Package contains the > extension which will be

Bug#863455: firefoxdriver: switch to geckodriver?

2017-05-26 Thread Paul Wise
Package: firefoxdriver Severity: wishlist Have you considered upgrading selenium in Debian, packaging geckodriver and removing firefoxdriver so that support for Firefox in Selenium works without using non-free software? https://github.com/mozilla/geckodriver -- bye, pabs