Hi!
On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 18:02:00 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Guillem Jover:
> > Ah, I think it would be nice to explain something along these lines
> > in the tag. I was rather confused by why the Makefile fragment was
> > recommended over a simple already correct call.
> >
> > I'm also
Guillem Jover:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 22:08:36 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> Guillem Jover wrote:
> Why is debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog a wishlist?
I'm a little confused by your question; are you asking why Lintian is
mentioning this in the first place? Or why it
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 22:08:36 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > > Why is debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog a wishlist?
> > >
> > > I'm a little confused by your question; are you asking why Lintian is
> > > mentioning this in the first place? Or why it reports at with
Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Why is debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog a wishlist?
> >
> > I'm a little confused by your question; are you asking why Lintian is
> > mentioning this in the first place? Or why it reports at with "wishlist"
> > severity? :)
>
> Yeah, I guess both. :)
So, I
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:27:29 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > Why is debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog a wishlist?
>
> I'm a little confused by your question; are you asking why Lintian is
> mentioning this in the first place? Or why it reports at with "wishlist"
> severity? :)
Yeah, I guess
Hi Guillem,
> Why is debian-rules-parses-dpkg-parsechangelog a wishlist?
I'm a little confused by your question; are you asking why Lintian is
mentioning this in the first place? Or why it reports at with "wishlist"
severity? :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb, Debian
6 matches
Mail list logo
