also sprach Jonas Smedegaard [2017-08-20 21:20 +0200]:
> Reason the package provides the virtual x-session-manager package
> is that it does satisfy the needs of recommendations by login
> managers and xinit.
>
> If you have suggestions for handling the situation better, or am
>
Hi Martin,
Quoting martin f krafft (2017-08-20 20:38:35)
> The package is said to be a session and window manager, but it does
> not register itself with the alternatives system as such. Could this
> be changed, or is there a reason this isn't the case?
Thanks for your interest in Sugar!
The
Package: sugar-session
Version: 0.110.0-3
Severity: minor
The package is said to be a session and window manager, but it does
not register itself with the alternatives system as such. Could this
be changed, or is there a reason this isn't the case?
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
3 matches
Mail list logo