On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:24:57AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > (see build log[2]). My suspicion is that this is not really an error in
> > > the test suite but some problem with the autobuilder? Could somebody
> > >
Hi Sébastien,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:17:26PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > (see build log[2]). My suspicion is that this is not really an error in
> > the test suite but some problem with the autobuilder? Could somebody
> > please have a look? If not the only chance I see is to
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:44:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pandas/0.19.2-5.1ubuntu4/+build/13337694)
>
> This is not a problem with the Debian autobuilder. Something is attempting
> an unaligned access, which is not portable on armhf.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:15:15PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> I made some progress with excluding some tests on some architectures. The
> last target I was trying to tackle was s390x which builds now. Not all
> architectures have finished [1] currently but armhf has now failed with
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:15:15PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Not all
> architectures have finished [1] currently but armhf has now failed with
[…]
> (see build log[2]). My suspicion is that this is not really an error in
> the test suite but some problem with the autobuilder? Could
Hi,
I made some progress with excluding some tests on some architectures. The
last target I was trying to tackle was s390x which builds now. Not all
architectures have finished [1] currently but armhf has now failed with
...
6 matches
Mail list logo