Hi Gabriel!
Let me explain more briefly how I see the future of Kodi from Debian according
to my grand plan.
July 26, 2020 4:33:22 PM UTC, "Gabriel F. T. Gomes"
написав(-ла):
>Hmm, that's not a decision to be made lightly. Would the backport to
>buster fix any bugs or add features that users
Hi, Vasyl,
On 26 Jul 2020, Vasyl Gello wrote:
>I need it to satisfy kodi build dependency in libcdio++. Actually, when Kodi
>19.0 goes live officially,
>I would like to have it in unstable, testing (if it gets released before the
>freeze takes place)
That sounds reasonable, and I'm already
Hi Gabriel!
July 25, 2020 11:11:05 PM UTC, "Gabriel F. T. Gomes"
написав(-ла):
>On 25 Jul 2020, Vasyl Gello wrote:
>>Without that, we can not upload backport to buster-bpo.
>
>I'm sorry if you have mentioned this before, but why is a backport
>needed?
I need it to satisfy kodi build dependency
Hi, Vasyl,
On 25 Jul 2020, Vasyl Gello wrote:
>
>Can you please upload libcdio to unstable?
Yes.
The upload to experimental didn't help *me* much with the testing of
pragha, because, in order for pragha to use the new version, I also had
to rebuild (locally) libcdio-paranoia (if I install
Hi Gabriel!
Can you please upload libcdio to unstable?
Without that, we can not upload backport to buster-bpo.
--
Vasyl Gello
==
Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77
E-Mail: vasek.ge...@gmail.com
Skype: vasek.gello
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:53:33AM +, Vasyl Gello wrote:
> Hi Gabriel!
>
> I investigated the reprotest failure on libcdio and it seems a reborn
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795690
> Is it possible to exclude GMT-14 from reprotest or is it better to try fixing
>
Hi Gabriel!
I investigated the reprotest failure on libcdio and it seems a reborn
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795690
Is it possible to exclude GMT-14 from reprotest or is it better to try fixing
upstream instead?
--
Vasyl Gello
Hi, Vasyl,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Vasyl Gello wrote:
> The MR I amended after Gabriel's review is stuck since June 2nd.
Yes, my bad.
> Gabriel, can you please revise the MR and upload the fixed package to the
> queue?
Will do (I'll try to do it today)! Thanks for the heads-up.
:)
Dear colleagues,
The MR I amended after Gabriel's review is stuck since June 2nd.
Gabriel, can you please revise the MR and upload the fixed package to the queue?
--
Vasyl Gello
==
Certified SolidWorks Expert
Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77
E-Mail:
Hi Gabriel, Balint!
Please check merge request to debian/cdio. Reprotest still fails at a first
glance, but lintian warnings have gone.
I will try fixing it but I need to install reprotest hook inside my pbuilder.
If you manage to fix reprotest, please let me know.
--
Vasyl Gello
On Tue, 02 Jun 2020, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>
> Done. I've omitted the last commit because I suggest using -1~exp0
> Debian version for the upload to experimental. IMO looks nicer when
> the upload to unstable has -1.
Thanks for the review. I'll fix this, then upload again to mentors.
Hi Gabriel,
Gabriel F. T. Gomes ezt írta (időpont:
2020. jún. 2., K, 0:46):
>
> On 01 Jun 2020, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> >
> >I've checked the package and it refers to
> >https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libcdio as the packaging repo while it
> >is not present.
> >I fyou agree let me clone your
On 01 Jun 2020, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>
>I've checked the package and it refers to
>https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libcdio as the packaging repo while it
>is not present.
>I fyou agree let me clone your packaging repo there, then I can review
>the changes.
Oh, please. And thank you. :)
>I can't
Hi Gabriel!
I have just checked the mentors page for libcdio & found out Lintian is mad
about
some issues.
Let me fix it quickly and file a new PR.
Vasyl
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:23:48 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?QsOhbGludCBSw6ljemV5?=
wrote:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> Vasyl Gello ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jún.
Hi Gabriel,
Vasyl Gello ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jún. 1., H, 7:49):
>
> Hi Gabriel!
>
> >The package is now on mentors:
> >
> >https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio
I've checked the package and it refers to
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libcdio as the packaging repo while it
is not
Hi Gabriel!
>The package is now on mentors:
>
>https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio
>
>Balint, could you review it and, if everything is fine, sponsor it?
>(I'm asking because Vasyl mentioned you are guiding the packaging of
>Kodi, if I got it right)
Yes, you are correct. I also did upload
On 31 May 2020, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
>
>we will need a sponsor.
The package is now on mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio
Balint, could you review it and, if everything is fine, sponsor it?
(I'm asking because Vasyl mentioned you are guiding the packaging of
Kodi, if I got
Hi, Vasyl,
On 24 May 2020, Vasyl Gello wrote:
>
>Yes experimental is OK for me, even though I uploaded libshairplay &
>libudfread to unstable queue. Balint asked me initially to target Kodi 19.0 to
>experimental so I will probably re-upload both libraries to experimental to
>keep everything
Hi Gabriel!
May 24, 2020 9:40:59 PM UTC, "Gabriel F. T. Gomes"
написав(-ла):
>
>Initially, and because I was a little
>uncomfortable with the soname change, I thought about uploading to
>experimental first. Would that work for you?
>
Yes experimental is OK for me, even though I uploaded
Hi, Vasyl,
on 24 May 2020, Vasyl Gello wrote:
>
>Gabriel has prepared 2.1.0 in his Salsa repo and I added C++ interfaces needed
>by Kodi 19.0:
>https://salsa.debian.org/gabrielftg-guest/libcdio/-/merge_requests/1
Thank you so much for writing this pull requests. I wasn't aware that
there was a
Dear colleagues,
Gabriel has prepared 2.1.0 in his Salsa repo and I added C++ interfaces needed
by Kodi 19.0:
https://salsa.debian.org/gabrielftg-guest/libcdio/-/merge_requests/1
Can the version 2.1.0 be pushed into distribution?
--
Vasyl Gello
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
21 matches
Mail list logo
