> For nearly everything that it gets used for, libseccomp depends on
> CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER.
In that case, we're out of luck:
Without writing a kernel patch for full seccomp support on these
architectures, there won't be a libseccomp2 for them.
Should this bug be kept open then?
I think it
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 02:02:29PM +0200, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> At least on sparc64 and sh4 we have SECCOMP support in kernel, but not
> HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER. Does libseccomp need HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER?
For nearly everything that it gets used for, libseccomp depends on
> > libseccomp2 is missing ia64 support. it would be awfully nice if it was
> > added.
> > (I hope to add it myself at some point, and this seems like a good place
> > for a reminder.)
>
> Going through upstream would be the best way to get this added. Having
> said that, it looks like the
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 upstream
Hi,
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 23:08:01 -0500 Jason Duerstock
wrote:
> Package: libseccomp2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> libseccomp2 is missing ia64 support. it would be awfully nice if it was
>
Package: libseccomp2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
libseccomp2 is missing ia64 support. it would be awfully nice if it was added.
(I hope to add it myself at some point, and this seems like a good place for a
reminder.)
Thanks,
Jason
-- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid
5 matches
Mail list logo