On Thu, 2022-09-01 at 10:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Thanks for that. For the record, I'm not involved in the package and
> the bug report was only a drive-by bug for an unimportant issue,
> so I don't have any intention to work on this myself.
PS: I just noticed the package is orphaned, so
On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 17:10 +0200, Thomas Uhle wrote:
> Now I have attached the patch to upstream's bug ticket as requested
> after recovering my Sourceforge account. Anyway, I don't have hope
> that there is going to happen much. Yet it would be good if Debian's
> libdbus-c++-* packages could
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Paul Wise wrote:
Thanks for the patch, please consider sending it upstream too,
even though upstream doesn't appear to be very active.
You're welcome. And thank you for fixing the typo in the URL to
upstream's bug ticket.
Now I have attached the patch to upstream's
On Tue, 2022-08-30 at 22:59 +0200, Thomas Uhle wrote:
> I have prepared a patch for changing the order in which the libraries
> are built and to fix linking.
Thanks for the patch, please consider sending it upstream too,
even though upstream doesn't appear to be very active.
--
bye,
pabs
Tags: patch
Dear maintainers,
I have prepared a patch for changing the order in which the libraries
are built and to fix linking.
Best regards,
Thomas UhleDescription: Fix build order and linking of libraries
Author: Thomas Uhle
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/889114
---
Dear maintainers,
as you can see from the build log, both libraries libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.0
and libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.0 are built before libdbus-c++-1.so.0 instead of
after. That is the main reason why they cannot be linked to it. I think
it would be best if the build order could be
Package: libdbus-c++-1-0v5
Version: 0.9.0-8.1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.0.0.0
File: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.0.0.0
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: undefined-symbol adequate
libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so and
7 matches
Mail list logo
