On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:12:38PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:06:19 +0100 > From: Sven Hoexter <s...@timegate.de> > To: Nicholas D Steeves <nstee...@gmail.com>, 891996-d...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#891996: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4-1 [I maintain the > package] > User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) > > > Hi Nicholas, > since I did not see any action by someone else I've just uploaded > it to unstable. I think folks committed to use btrfs engage with the toolchain > more then people like me, who's still riding on this boring ext4. ;) > > Sven
Hi Sven, Thank you for uploading! I totally understand riding on boring ext4, and it's what I still recommend for friends, family, and colleagues (especially for laptops) :-) I wonder if ext4 will gain metadata checksums by default before XFS gains ext4's reputation for resiliency to powerloss and memory bitflips? I hope btrfs soon stabilizes to the point where it can be recommended as a general purpose default...with a wiki page more along the lines of "use it, it works" than "here are all the things that could go wrong, and how to work around them". Cheers, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature