Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > Shouldn't not so much used packages preferably not be backported (to > avoid maintenance costs to other involved parties) ? The backports policy says "Please only upload package with a notable userbase. User request for the package may be

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-11 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Le 09/03/2018 à 03:14, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new >> upstream version 0.11.0. > > Uploaded. > > PS: if you would like to upload an official backport, feel free to > file

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new > upstream version 0.11.0. Uploaded. PS: if you would like to upload an official backport, feel free to file another RFS for that when it reaches testing. -- bye, pabs

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-08 Thread Alexis Murzeau
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new upstream version 0.11.0. * Package name: streamlink Version : 0.11.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Streamlink Team * URL :