Bug#892590: Review graphite2

2018-03-19 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I am not going over the .-release procedure for this, I'd have uploaded > to security, though, but... > > I don't think we should special-case our oldest, > soon-to-be-not-supported release. Agreed, it doesn't make sense to fix

Bug#892590: Review graphite2

2018-03-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 19.03.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:39:57AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: > >> I prepared LTS security update for graphite2[1]. Debdiff is attached. > >> All tests ran successfully. Please

Bug#892590: Review graphite2

2018-03-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 19.03.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:39:57AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: >> I prepared LTS security update for graphite2[1]. Debdiff is attached. >> All tests ran successfully. Please review. > > Why would we need one given for jessie and stretch it is

Bug#892590: Review graphite2

2018-03-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:39:57AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote: > I prepared LTS security update for graphite2[1]. Debdiff is attached. > All tests ran successfully. Please review. Why would we need one given for jessie and stretch it is clearly marked as no-DSA?

Bug#892590: Review graphite2

2018-03-18 Thread Abhijith PA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello. I prepared LTS security update for graphite2[1]. Debdiff is attached. All tests ran successfully. Please review. - -abhijith [1] https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/graphite2/graphite2_1.3.10 - -1~deb7u2.dsc -BEGIN PGP