Bug#894159: transition: icu

On 13/05/18 22:52, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Last but not least I've a different understanding (again) of package > transitions with Adrian Bunk. He reassigned #898465 [2] to ICU, when both > related bugreports of ncmpcpp [3] and viking due to mapnik [4] are due to > partial upgrades

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:36 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > On 01/05/18 19:29, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > OK, the fresh transition testing is the following. > Alright, let's do this. I was off the grid on the weekend, but a quick

Bug#894159: transition: icu

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 01/05/18 19:29, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:31 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 23/04/18 21:40, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >>> I do agree and open to do an other compilation test of the dependent >>>

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 08:06:57PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Yes, that's why various LibreOffice/Document Liberation libraries > (and LO also patched firebird) - parts of this reverted since > c++11-using projects apparently don't need it) did add a > -DUCHAR_TYPE=uint16_t to their defines.

Bug#894159: transition: icu

Hi, On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 05:29:33PM +, László Böszörményi wrote: > 5.10.1+dfsg-2) were uploaded to experimental. Now it FTBFS due to GCC > being picky. Recent ICU (59.1+) named variable types to be consistent for > different architectures. That is, UChar defaults to char16_t but can be >

Bug#894159: transition: icu

Hi, > pyicu FTBFS, seems unmaintained. Last upload was in 2016 and since then > there were seven upstream releases. Version 1.9.8+ builds fine with the new > ICU version. Maintainer also Cc-d, may I overtake it? unmaintained is the wrong word, I try to have it uptodate before the next release -

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:31 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/04/18 21:40, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > > I do agree and open to do an other compilation test of the dependent > > packages with icu-config being available. > Thanks. Let me know how that goes, and

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 09:19:06PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: >> > I would appreciate a number of failing rdeps and how many are due to ICU >> > API >> > changes and how many are due to icu-config removal. >> [...] I

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 09:19:06PM +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > I would appreciate a number of failing rdeps and how many are due to ICU API > > changes and how many are due to icu-config removal. > [...] I do not > recall any API change. In short, there are fifteen packages FTBFS and

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On 23/04/18 21:40, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 23/04/18 21:19, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >>> As I remember, 99% of the FTBFS reasons were the icu-config removal, >>> others are the dependent

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:27 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/04/18 21:19, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> As I remember, 99% of the FTBFS reasons were the icu-config removal, >> others are the dependent package bugs I've already mentioned. I do not >> recall any

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On 23/04/18 21:19, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> First of all, sorry for the delay. I saw there were several issues here and >> decided to postpone this a bit. > Emilio! I already owe you a couple of beers.

Bug#894159: transition: icu

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > First of all, sorry for the delay. I saw there were several issues here and > decided to postpone this a bit. Emilio! I already owe you a couple of beers. Hope we can meet again in Hsinchu and have a chat about

Bug#894159: transition: icu

Hi László, First of all, sorry for the delay. I saw there were several issues here and decided to postpone this a bit. Please see some questions below. On 26/03/18 22:29, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > It will need a quick bootstrap. It needs to build without the Layout > Engine API, then the

Bug#894159: transition: icu

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RMs, While I've packaged new ICU releases, those were uploaded only to experimental. It's really time to change this, especially that some packages already need ICU 60.1+. It will