Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#902316: gnupg failing
completely in dgit autopkgtests [and 1 more messages]"):
> Hi Ian--
>
> I don't know what the current status of the failing tests suites is for
> dgit -- last i heard, you had to have major, clunk
Hi Ian--
I don't know what the current status of the failing tests suites is for
dgit -- last i heard, you had to have major, clunky workarounds to avoid
problems with concurrent access to gpg-agent, or else gpg-agent would
(intermittently, unpredictably) fail on some requests.
Please correct me
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Bug#902316: gnupg failing completely in dgit
autopkgtests [and 1 more messages]"):
> I attempted to work around this problem by explicitly starting and
> stopping the gpg-agent. This has dramatically reduced the failure
> probability.
...
> I am
I attempted to work around this problem by explicitly starting and
stopping the gpg-agent. This has dramatically reduced the failure
probability.
Now we have a log where gpg-agent claims
gpg-agent: a gpg-agent is already running - not starting a new one
even though there clearly cannot be a
(dropping the gnupg bug again)
Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Bug#902316: gnupg failing completely in dgit
autopkgtests"):
> Adding Martin and Antonio into the loop, as I don't know the details of
> autopkgtest so well. Question is near the bottom.
Thanks for your attention, everyone.
> PS: for you
5 matches
Mail list logo
