On Thursday, 2 January 2020 7:50:39 PM AEDT Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
>
> Ah I see there was already a mentioning of requesting CVEs *but* it
> was pointing to a not anymore available site of poeple.redhat.com, I
> updated the reference to
>
Hi
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:57:39PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thursday, 2 January 2020 6:20:23 PM AEDT Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > The good thing on having a CVE id for the vulnerabilities is helping
> > other vendors to track the issues properly 'cross-vendor' in an unique
> > way.
On Thursday, 2 January 2020 6:20:23 PM AEDT Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The good thing on having a CVE id for the vulnerabilities is helping
> other vendors to track the issues properly 'cross-vendor' in an unique
> way. If every upstream would use individual identifiers to track their
>
Hi Dmitry!
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:38:09AM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Closing obsolete bug...
>
> On Sunday, 22 July 2018 5:11:39 AM AEDT Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > https://civicrm.org/advisory/civi-sa-2018-07-remote-code-execution-in-quick
> > form
> >
> > This is already fixed, so
Source: civicrm
Version: 4.7.30+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Control: fixed -1 5.3.1+dfsg-1
https://civicrm.org/advisory/civi-sa-2018-07-remote-code-execution-in-quickform
This is already fixed, so this bug is to track the issue in the BTS.
No CVEs seem to be assigned for the
5 matches
Mail list logo
