Sounds reasonable. Could you send a merge request at https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/ratt/blob/master/debian/control please? You can use the Edit button to perform the edit in your browser (but please test the resulting package). If you don’t have an account yet, see https://signup.salsa.debian.org/
Thanks! On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:42 AM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni < nico...@braud-santoni.eu> wrote: > Package: ratt > Version: 0.0~git20160202.0.a14e2ff-1+b3 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > When using ratt, it attempts to call dose-ceve (from the dose-extra > package) > and if the binary is missing it falls back to interpreting the sources > index > itself. > > As such, I believe ratt should declare an optional dependency (Recommends > or > Suggests) on dose-extra; I believe Recommends would be appropriate as ratt > has degraded functionality without it (as far as I understand). > > > Best, > > nicoo > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: buster/sid > APT prefers testing > APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: > LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: > LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) > > Versions of packages ratt depends on: > ii libc6 2.27-5 > > ratt recommends no packages. > > ratt suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list > pkg-go-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ > pkg-go-maintainers -- Best regards, Michael
