Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2019-02-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi, On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:02:01AM +, Kevin Smith wrote: > The packages are with mattia for uploading, but I know he’s very busy > so hasn’t looked at them yet. Should we go another way to get them > checked and uploaded? Sorry for waiting so long, it slipped through a few craks… I just

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2019-02-21 Thread Kevin Smith
On 20 Feb 2019, at 22:19, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:31:17AM +, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On 27 Dec 2018, at 22:52, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:41:47PM +, Kevin Smith wrote: Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2019-02-20 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:31:17AM +, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 27 Dec 2018, at 22:52, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:41:47PM +, Kevin Smith wrote: > >> Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an update from upstream and > >> not gotten it submitted. We’ll

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2019-01-15 Thread Kevin Smith
On 27 Dec 2018, at 22:52, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:41:47PM +, Kevin Smith wrote: >> Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an update from upstream and not >> gotten it submitted. We’ll try to address this in the next week or so. > > What's the status :-)

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2018-12-27 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:41:47PM +, Kevin Smith wrote: > Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an update from upstream and not > gotten it submitted. We’ll try to address this in the next week or so. What's the status :-) Cheers, Moritz

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2018-12-07 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2018-12-07 13:41, Kevin Smith wrote: > Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an update from upstream and not > gotten it submitted. We’ll try to address this in the next week or so. Nice! If you intend to raise the package from the not yet dead, please consider joining the XMPP

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2018-12-07 Thread Kevin Smith
Apologies, I’d forgotten that we’d prepared an update from upstream and not gotten it submitted. We’ll try to address this in the next week or so. /K > On 6 Dec 2018, at 21:55, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > Source: swift-im > Severity: serious > > Should swift-im be removed? > - No upload

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2018-12-06 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2018-12-06 22:55, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Unless any objections are raised, I'd reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org > for removal. I contacted the maintainers about the package in April, but did not yet receive an answer.

Bug#915805: Should this package be removed?

2018-12-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Source: swift-im Severity: serious Should swift-im be removed? - No upload since more than two years - Totally outdated compared to upstream - Virtually no users in popcon - Depends on legacy libs (OpenSSL 1.0, qt4) Unless any objections are raised, I'd reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org for