Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-19 Thread Yavor Doganov
On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 21:10:31 +0200, Steve McIntyre wrote: > base/NSInvocation/general.m: > Failed test: general.m:208 ... Can send/return NSRect I tried to reproduce this on gcc117 (an AMD Opteron 1100 machine from the GCC Compile Farm, which should be able to run 32-bit executables according

Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-07 Thread Yavor Doganov
Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:23PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 10:38:55AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > >> > >>I see that libffi was also built on arm-arm-01. It would help a lot > >>if you can retry the gnustep-base build with libffi built on

Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:24:23PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 10:38:55AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: >> >>I see that libffi was also built on arm-arm-01. It would help a lot >>if you can retry the gnustep-base build with libffi built on armhf. >>If it succeeds it would

Bug#918366: Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-07 Thread Yavor Doganov
Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:17:58PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 03:56:50PM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > >>$ gnustep-tests NSDate > >>--- Running tests in NSDate --- > >> > >> 50 Passed tests > >> > >>All OK! > >>$ > > > >I'll

Bug#918366: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 06:17:58PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 03:56:50PM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: >>> On 5 Jan 2019, at 15:00, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >... > >>> I'm honestly not sure about what casues the failures. Is a "dashed >>> hope" a test fail? :-(

Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 10:38:55AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: >Steve McIntyre wrote: >> Package: src:gnustep-base >> Version: 1.25.1-4 >> Severity: important > >> I've tried to build gnustep-base for armhf on top of arm64, and AFAICS >> it's failing some of its tests: > >Thanks for the report.

Bug#918366: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-07 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 03:56:50PM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: >> On 5 Jan 2019, at 15:00, Steve McIntyre wrote: ... >> I'm honestly not sure about what casues the failures. Is a "dashed >> hope" a test fail? :-( > >That's a test skipped because it's one that depends on the software

Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
Steve McIntyre wrote: > Package: src:gnustep-base > Version: 1.25.1-4 > Severity: important > I've tried to build gnustep-base for armhf on top of arm64, and AFAICS > it's failing some of its tests: Thanks for the report. Only one test is failing: | base/NSInvocation/general.m: | Failed test:

Bug#918366: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-05 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
> On 5 Jan 2019, at 15:00, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Package: src:gnustep-base > Version: 1.25.1-4 > Severity: important > > Hi! > > I've been doing a full rebuild of the Debian archive, building all > source packages targeting armel and armhf using arm64 hardware. We are > planning in future

Bug#918366: FTBFS for armhf on arm64, fails some tests

2019-01-05 Thread Steve McIntyre
Package: src:gnustep-base Version: 1.25.1-4 Severity: important Hi! I've been doing a full rebuild of the Debian archive, building all source packages targeting armel and armhf using arm64 hardware. We are planning in future to move all of our 32-bit armel/armhf builds to using arm64 machines,