On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 23:44:54 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-01-08 20:17:42 [+], Simon McVittie wrote:
> > It should probably at least have a Breaks on libssl1.0.2, to protect
> > partial upgrades from stretch. Some release notes for users of
> > third-party software might
On 2019-01-08 20:17:42 [+], Simon McVittie wrote:
> It should probably at least have a Breaks on libssl1.0.2, to protect
> partial upgrades from stretch. Some release notes for users of
> third-party software might also be useful. I realise it probably isn't
> feasible to keep openssl.cnf
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:17:42PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: openssl
> Version: 1.1.1a-1
> Severity: important
> Control: found -1 1.1.1~~pre3-1
> Control: affects -1 steam
>
> The openssl.cnf in the openssl package since 1.1.1~~pre3-1 is incompatible
> with libssl < 1.1.0 (I think
3 matches
Mail list logo
