Hi Ludovico,
[...]
> I was able to reproduce the error that you faced.
> The wormhole test didn't import the required key, so it failed if the
> testing private key wasn't already in the keyring.
I see.
> I wrote a fix [1] and very soon (probably even tomorrow) we should
> release a hotfix
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 19:08:25 -0500 Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On Sat 2019-01-19 18:53:28 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> > as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the
> > gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to
> > switch everything to
On Sat 2019-01-19 18:53:28 +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the
> gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to
> switch everything to Python 3 due to dependency requirements (some
> Python modules newly
Hi Sascha,
I was able to reproduce the error that you faced.
The wormhole test didn't import the required key, so it failed if the
testing private key wasn't already in the keyring.
I wrote a fix [1] and very soon (probably even tomorrow) we should
release a hotfix release 1.0.1 of
Hi,
seems to be our fault.
We're on it and hopefully tag a 1.0.1 very soon.
Thanks for the report!
tags 919747 help
thanks
Hi Daniel,
as you may not have noticed, I have prepared packaging for 1.0.0 in the
gnome-keysign repo on Salsa [1]. It took some work because I had to
switch everything to Python 3 due to dependency requirements (some
Python modules newly required in 1.0.0 are only
Package: gnome-keysign
Version: 0.9.8-1
Severity: wishlist
gnome-keysign 1.0.0 was released by upstream 11 days ago:
https://github.com/gnome-keysign/gnome-keysign/releases/tag/1.0.0
It would be great if we could have it in debian!
thanks for maintaining gnome-keysign,
--dkg
-- System
7 matches
Mail list logo
