Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2020-01-09 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 16:58 +, Anton Ivanov wrote: > > On 06/01/2020 16:21, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Control: tag -1 +help > > > > On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 10:38 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > On my sid system: > > > ``` > > > $ strings /usr/bin/linux.uml | grep port-helper > > >

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2020-01-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 16:58 +, Anton Ivanov wrote: > On 06/01/2020 16:21, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Control: tag -1 +help > > > > On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 10:38 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > On my sid system: > > > ``` > > > $ strings /usr/bin/linux.uml | grep port-helper > > >

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2020-01-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 21:51 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > First, for context to the readers here, the port-helper binary is > shipped with uml-utilities package. This package, depending on the > architecture, installs the binary to a architecture specific > location. > >

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2020-01-06 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 06/01/2020 16:21, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Control: tag -1 +help On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 10:38 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: On my sid system: ``` $ strings /usr/bin/linux.uml | grep port-helper /usr/lib//uml/port-helper ``` So the path is still incorrect even with newer upstream kernels.

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2020-01-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 +help On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 10:38 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On my sid system: > ``` > $ strings /usr/bin/linux.uml | grep port-helper > /usr/lib//uml/port-helper > ``` > > So the path is still incorrect even with newer upstream kernels. I spent some time today looking at the

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2020-01-06 Thread Sjoerd Simons
Package: user-mode-linux Version: 5.4-1um-2 Followup-For: Bug #928924 On my sid system: ``` $ strings /usr/bin/linux.uml | grep port-helper /usr/lib//uml/port-helper ``` So the path is still incorrect even with newer upstream kernels. -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 19:57 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > what is the best way to request a rebuild of the package ? reportbug release.debian.org and select binnmu. https://wiki.debian.org/binNMU https://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-16 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 21:00 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > BTW, is it possible to do source-only uploads so that the build logs > are available on amd64, or do the versioned binaries mean no logs? If > so I think it would be good to only upload i386 binary packages so > that > we get the build logs for

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 13:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Does user-mode-linux need to be a separate source package at all? I guess it is separate to not require building yet another variant. Looks like merging it was discussed in 2016: https://bugs.debian.org/837920 -- bye, pabs

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-14 Thread Paul Wise
Control: notforwarded -1 On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:36 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I submitted this fix upstream to the kernel some time ago. I don't > recollect if the 4.19 kernel is what had it included. > >

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 18:13 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 10:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Irrespective, I think it is a fair candidate to be backported if > > 4.19 > > > missed that window. For User-Mode-Linux, The sources are the same > > that > > > the Debian

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 10:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Irrespective, I think it is a fair candidate to be backported if > 4.19 > > missed that window. For User-Mode-Linux, The sources are the same > that > > the Debian Linux kernel team maintains. So either they could pick > this > > commit

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2019-05-14 at 14:36 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Control: tag -1 +fixed-upstream > > CC: Adding Debian Kernel Maintainers > > > Hello Paul, > > I submitted this fix upstream to the kernel some time ago. I don't > recollect if the 4.19 kernel is what had it included. It went into

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 +fixed-upstream CC: Adding Debian Kernel Maintainers Hello Paul, I submitted this fix upstream to the kernel some time ago. I don't recollect if the 4.19 kernel is what had it included.

Bug#928924: user-mode-linux: xterm functionality broken due to wrong path to port-helper

2019-05-12 Thread Paul Wise
Package: user-mode-linux Version: 4.19-1um-1 Severity: important File: /usr/bin/linux.uml linux.uml in a GNOME terminal gives these errors in new tabs: There was an error creating the child process for this terminal Failed to execute child process “port-helper” (No such file or directory) The