On 07/05/2020 19:00, peter green wrote:
On 21/04/2020 22:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, if I'm following correctly, what you seem to propose, is to remove
Python 2 from unittest2. If that's the case, then I agree with such a
plan. I just didn't dare to do it yet.
Though in fact, I already
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 2:00:58 PM EDT peter green wrote:
> I got a failure too when I cloned that branch and tried to build it, but
> once I added in the changes from the previous NMU it built fine. I would
> push that addition back to the branch but i'm not currently a member of the
> python
On 21/04/2020 22:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Python 2 has never been removed from this
package. Though instead, we shall remove this source package entirely
from Debian.
# Broken Depends:
nipype: python-nipype
pytest: pypy-pytest
python-logfury: python3-logfury
python-oslo.utils:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 09:57:30AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 4/20/20 4:36 AM, peter green wrote:
>
> Funcsigs is a backport of the PEP 362 function signature features from
> Python 3.3's inspect module. Python 2 has never been removed from this
> package. Though instead, we shall remove
On 21/04/2020 22:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, if I'm following correctly, what you seem to propose, is to remove
Python 2 from unittest2. If that's the case, then I agree with such a
plan. I just didn't dare to do it yet.
Yes, whichever approach is taken to dealing with funcsigs, unittest2
On 4/22/20 6:23 AM, Valentin Vidić wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:20:16PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> You can remove all of the python-oslo* from the list. The versions in
>> Experimental, which are the next version of OpenStack, are fixed. In 2
>> weeks of time, I'll upload all what I
Hi,
út 21. 4. 2020 v 23:24 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal:
> > But that still leaves the question of what to do about the dependency of
> > pytest on pypy-funcsigs ? should pypy modules be removed from pytest and
> > it's reverse-dependencies in the same way that regular python2 modules
> >
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:20:16PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> You can remove all of the python-oslo* from the list. The versions in
> Experimental, which are the next version of OpenStack, are fixed. In 2
> weeks of time, I'll upload all what I staged in Experimental to Sid
> (maybe 150
Hi Thomas (2020.04.21_21:20:16_+)
> > But that still leaves the question of what to do about the dependency of
> > pytest on pypy-funcsigs ? should pypy modules be removed from pytest and
> > it's reverse-dependencies in the same way that regular python2 modules
> > were? how feasible is that?
On 4/20/20 2:51 PM, peter green wrote:
> On 20/04/2020 08:57, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Option 1: fix all four packages to be python 2 free.
>>>
>>> Option 2: Remove python2 stuff from traceback2, python-funcsigs and
>>> numba. Break the dependencies of nipype in sid.
>>>
>>> Option 3: Remove
On Monday, April 20, 2020 8:51:10 AM EDT peter green wrote:
> On 20/04/2020 08:57, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Option 1: fix all four packages to be python 2 free.
> >>
> >> Option 2: Remove python2 stuff from traceback2, python-funcsigs and
> >> numba. Break the dependencies of nipype in sid.
>
On 20/04/2020 08:57, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Option 1: fix all four packages to be python 2 free.
Option 2: Remove python2 stuff from traceback2, python-funcsigs and
numba. Break the dependencies of nipype in sid.
Option 3: Remove python2 stuff from traceback2, modify python-funcsigs
so it still
On 4/20/20 4:36 AM, peter green wrote:
> (using -quiet aliases where multiple involved packages have the same
> maintainer listed.
>
> Hi
>
> I have just been running some self-contained buildability tests on
> bullseye and these tests indicated that the python-linecache2 and
> python-traceback2
13 matches
Mail list logo
