control: tag -1 +pending
Hello,
On Sat 04 Jan 2020 at 05:51PM -05, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Russ said off-list he was ready for seconds.
> I second his patch with the status being encouraged rather than
> recommended change.
> In seconding, my primary review criteria was whether I thought the
>
Lorenzo Puliti writes:
> I wonder if it make sense to encourage or even recommend to use the
> interpreter in /lib/init/init-d-script for writing init scripts.
> Or maybe just citing that there is an interpreter and say that
> it's the preferred way to create init scripts, I don't know..
>
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.4.1.2
Followup-For: Bug #948115
Hi,
> Writing the scripts
> ~~~
> ...
> +The ``start``, ``stop``, ``restart``, and ``force-reload`` options should
> +be supported by all init scripts. Supporting ``status`` is recommended but
> +not required.
Russ said off-list he was ready for seconds.
I second his patch with the status being encouraged rather than
recommended change.
In seconding, my primary review criteria was whether I thought the
change accurately reflected what the GR conclusion was.
--Sam
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Sam Hartman writes:
> I've reviewed your patch.
> It looks good.
> One minor suggestion:
> +The ``start``, ``stop``, ``restart``, and ``force-reload`` options should
> +be supported by all init scripts. Supporting ``status`` is recommended but
> +not required. The ``reload`` and
I've reviewed your patch.
It looks good.
One minor suggestion:
+The ``start``, ``stop``, ``restart``, and ``force-reload`` options should
+be supported by all init scripts. Supporting ``status`` is recommended but
+not required. The ``reload`` and ``try-restart`` options are optional.
How about
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.4.1.2
Severity: important
Per recent (non-BTS) discussion, this patch is a first draft at
reconciling Policy with the recent GR result. Summary of changes:
* Change section headings and anchors to reflect the more general topic
* Add recommended naming
7 matches
Mail list logo
