On 1/4/20 3:25 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 03:15:02PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Feel free to do the same for powerpc as the build machine
>> for ppc64 and powerpc is the same and the new one for
>> both architectures will be even faster.
>
> No, powerpc in
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 03:15:02PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Feel free to do the same for powerpc as the build machine
> for ppc64 and powerpc is the same and the new one for
> both architectures will be even faster.
No, powerpc in 32bits is dead.
And I even enabled i386 there
On 1/4/20 2:57 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Yes, because BUILD_NOGUI_PACKAGES=y is set because of findstring vs. filter.
>
> There you *are* right, I didn't say anything else.
This bug report was just about this particular issue
of using the wrong keyword.
>> What? I'm not sure why this would be
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 02:33:51PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 1/4/20 2:28 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > That just means that BUILD_NOGUI_PACKAGES=n is set and the nogui part is
> > not even tried.
> > ppc64 is fast and has server uses, so should definitel get -nogui.
>
>
On 1/4/20 2:28 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> That just means that BUILD_NOGUI_PACKAGES=n is set and the nogui part is not
> even tried.
> ppc64 is fast and has server uses, so should definitel get -nogui.
That might be the case. But ppc64 is currently *not* in the list
of OOO_NOGUI_ARCH. Yet your
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 02:07:36PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 1/4/20 10:19 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I haven't verified it, but my suspicion is that the following conditional
> > test is
> > incorrect as the function findstring will match "ppc64" in
On 1/4/20 10:19 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I haven't verified it, but my suspicion is that the following conditional
> test is
> incorrect as the function findstring will match "ppc64" in OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS if
> it contains "ppc64el":
>
> ifeq "$(ENABLE_GUI)" "y"
> ifneq
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 10:19:13AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The build on ppc64 currently fails because debian/rules tries to execute some
> script code on ppc64 which is relevant for the OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS in
> debian/rules.
Yes.
> # remove lib*uilo.so in --nogui
> find
Source: libreoffice
Severity: normal
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64
Hi!
The build on ppc64 currently fails because debian/rules tries to execute some
script code on ppc64 which is relevant for the OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS in debian/rules.
Specifically, the build fails with:
#
9 matches
Mail list logo
