On 2020-02-29 15:29, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Dear Adam,
On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 21:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:37 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> So my changelog was incorrect as it set to 20070815.3-1+deb10u4,
> which actually should be 20070815.3-1+deb10u1, as
Dear Adam,
On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 21:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:37 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > So my changelog was incorrect as it set to 20070815.3-1+deb10u4,
> > which actually should be 20070815.3-1+deb10u1, as this is uml-
> > utilities package's first
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:37 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> So my changelog was incorrect as it set to 20070815.3-1+deb10u4,
> which actually should be 20070815.3-1+deb10u1, as this is uml-
> utilities package's first stable update proposed.
No. stable currently has
So my changelog was incorrect as it set to 20070815.3-1+deb10u4, which
actually should be 20070815.3-1+deb10u1, as this is uml-utilities
package's first stable update proposed.
Attached patch revises the version revision number.
On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 12:06 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
Control: tag -1 +patch
Sorry to have missed to attach the debdiff.
On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 13:49 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> The port-helper binary shipped with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The port-helper binary shipped with the uml-utilities package was
installed to a non-standard path creating problems for the uml tool to
find the helper binary. Details are
6 matches
Mail list logo
