On Sunday, 26 April 2020 12:38:25 PM AEST Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Shouldn't we move /usr/sbin/runc to /usr/bin/runc, since runc now has
> rootless mode after setting kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone?
Yeah, perhaps with a compatibility symlink. Why not?
Thanks.
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov.
control: clone -1 -2
control: reassign -2 runc
control: retitle -2 install runc symlink in /usr/bin
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:10 AM Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 26 April 2020 12:38:25 PM AEST Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Shouldn't we move /usr/sbin/runc to /usr/bin/runc, since runc now has
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:38 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 6:15 AM Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, 26 April 2020 12:14:25 AM AEST Tomas Janousek wrote:
> > > Debian installs runc as /usr/sbin/runc, and regular users don't have
> > > /usr/sbin in $PATH, so "buildah
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 6:15 AM Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 26 April 2020 12:14:25 AM AEST Tomas Janousek wrote:
> > Debian installs runc as /usr/sbin/runc, and regular users don't have
> > /usr/sbin in $PATH, so "buildah run" without "--runtime /usr/sbin/runc"
> > fails:
> >
> > $
On Sunday, 26 April 2020 12:14:25 AM AEST Tomas Janousek wrote:
> Debian installs runc as /usr/sbin/runc, and regular users don't have
> /usr/sbin in $PATH, so "buildah run" without "--runtime /usr/sbin/runc"
> fails:
>
> $ buildah run debian-working-container -- sh
> error running
Package: buildah
Version: 1.11.6-1
Severity: normal
Debian installs runc as /usr/sbin/runc, and regular users don't have /usr/sbin
in $PATH, so "buildah run" without "--runtime /usr/sbin/runc" fails:
$ buildah run debian-working-container -- sh
error running container: error creating
6 matches
Mail list logo