On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:50:35AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Honestly I don't think I currently have a regression test for this so
> it's possible I could have missed something upstream. I haven't seen
> any reports, though
>
> ZFS's ACL implementation is very different from any
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:45:27AM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> I disagree with this assessment. All of the reporters have been using
> ZFS, but this could indicate an absence of testers using other
> filesystems. We need someone with a NFS server which has a 4.15+ kernel
> and uses a
If you are violating our license please also don't spam our list when
using your crappy combination.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 02:54:31PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> indicated this was specifically observed on ZFS on Linux only. Seth
> Arnold's answer seem to be inline with that that the issue is more on
> the ZFS on Linux side and the issue keeps biting people a bit
> unexpectedly. Why
Hi Elliott,
[I'm adding linux-nfs upstream hopefully J. Bruce Fields or others can
help clarifying]
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:37:11PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> Bit more experimentation on this issue.
>
> I tried a very small C program meant to create files with fewer
> permissions bits
5 matches
Mail list logo
