Hi,
On 2021-09-19 16:18, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > Now in the same spirit as in #993955, I am not sure you actually want to
> > push maintainers to move libraries from /lib to /usr/lib
>
> The purpose of this tag was never to
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Now in the same spirit as in #993955, I am not sure you actually want to
> push maintainers to move libraries from /lib to /usr/lib
The purpose of this tag was never to push people toward usr-merge. It
only looks like that to glibc
On 2021-09-19 13:03, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:15 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > My question is why this new breakout-link tag has been added
>
> The tag was implemented in response to Bug#243158. [1] I am not sure
> about Yann's original suggestion,
Hi Aurelien,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:15 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> My question is why this new breakout-link tag has been added
The tag was implemented in response to Bug#243158. [1] I am not sure
about Yann's original suggestion, but I hope the tag is useful to
prevent links to /opt, for
On 2021-09-16 16:56, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:00 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > Why is that supposed to be an issue?
>
> I do not know, but the relocation error shows that the shared library
> installed in /lib by libgpg-error0 is not found unless
>
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> The fact that silencing this warning in the expected way ended up
> injecting a grave bug seems problematic.
It is an RPATH issue. I spotted '-rpath /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu' in
the libtool invocation. [1]
Hi Daniel,
Sorry about the delayed response on this part.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 4:30 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> instead i get a lintian warning
> lacks-unversioned-link-to-shared-library
That is a very simple check. [1] Would you please include the full tag
context and a list of
Hi Aurelien,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:00 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Why is that supposed to be an issue?
I do not know, but the relocation error shows that the shared library
installed in /lib by libgpg-error0 is not found unless
libgpg-error0-dev ships a "breakout" link in /usr/lib.
On my
Hi Felix,
On 2021-09-16 15:56, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >
> >
> > The fact that silencing this warning in the expected way ended up
> > injecting a grave bug seems problematic.
>
> Isn't that an issue with the library
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 9:39 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>
> The fact that silencing this warning in the expected way ended up
> injecting a grave bug seems problematic.
Isn't that an issue with the library paths in libgpg-error?
On sid, libgpg-error0_1.42-3_amd64.deb installs
Control: affects 968525 + libgpg-error-dev
On Thu 2021-08-19 20:52:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Control: affects 968525 - libgpg-error-dev
> Control: retitle 968525 lintian: breakout-link reported for
> /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) -> /lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) symlinks
>
> On Thu
Control: affects 968525 - libgpg-error-dev
Control: retitle 968525 lintian: breakout-link reported for
/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) -> /lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) symlinks
On Thu 2021-08-19 19:20:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I see the same issue in libgpg-error-dev with lintian
Control: affects 968525 + libgpg-error-dev libc6-dev
Control: found 968525 2.104.0
Control: retitle 968525 lintian: breakout-link reported for
/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) -> /lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) symlinks,
conflicts with lacks-unversioned-link-to-shared-library
On Mon 2020-08-17
Package: lintian
Version: 2.90.0
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Since recent version of lintian, the following tags are reported against
the libc6-dev package:
W: libc6-dev: breakout-link usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libBrokenLocale.so ->
14 matches
Mail list logo
