Bug#969538: vips/ruby-vips: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el

2020-10-07 Thread GCS
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:39 PM Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > According to upstream, this might fix the issue I'm not sure if Kleis Auke is part of upstream. But testing his fix on ARM64 - please give me some time as it's just an emulation for me and not very fast. Going to upload the fixed

Bug#969538: vips/ruby-vips: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el

2020-10-07 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
According to upstream, this might fix the issue diff -Nru vips-8.10.1/debian/changelog vips-8.10.1/debian/changelog --- vips-8.10.1/debian/changelog2020-10-03 18:41:08.0 +0200 +++ vips-8.10.1/debian/changelog2020-10-07 13:20:49.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +vips

Bug#969538: vips/ruby-vips: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el

2020-10-07 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/libvips/libvips/issues/1846 thanks G.

Bug#969538: vips/ruby-vips: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el

2020-10-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: affects -1 ruby-vips G. On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 17:14:23 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Source: vips > Version: 8.10.0-1 > Severity: serious > > Hello, your package regressed its testsuite on arm64 in Debian and Ubuntu (in > Ubuntu also ppc64el, in Debian I didn't check but the

Bug#969538: vips/ruby-vips: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and ppc64el

2020-09-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Source: vips Version: 8.10.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, your package regressed its testsuite on arm64 in Debian and Ubuntu (in Ubuntu also ppc64el, in Debian I didn't check but the failure is the same) https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-vips/testing/arm64/