Bug#975640: fdupes: segfault when using -d -I options

2021-01-14 Thread Otto Visser
I could indeed reproduce that: Stack trace of thread 3038787: #0 0x556080008e0b log_file_remaining (fdupes + 0xbe0b) #1 0x55608000315a deletesuccessor (fdupes + 0x615a) #2 0x55608dd8 main (fdupes + 0x3dd8) #3 0x7f46c8255d0a __libc_start_main (libc.so.6 + 0x26d0a) #4

Bug#975640: fdupes: segfault when using -d -I options

2020-12-18 Thread Joel Ray Holveck
I think this is fixed upstream in 2.1.2; see https://github.com/adrianlopezroche/fdupes/commit/c0dd064bb02b5496e1ef51fcc9eed11dd08b6268

Bug#975640: fdupes: segfault when using -d -I options

2020-12-15 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Hello Otto, if you still can reproduce the segfault then it might also be possible to install the package systemd-coredump. That way a backtrace should show up in 'journalctl -e' giving some more details of where the segfault happens. This should get more informative if the fdupes-dbgsym gets

Bug#975640: fdupes: segfault when using -d -I options

2020-11-24 Thread Otto Visser
Package: fdupes Version: 1:2.1.1-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, while trying to clean up I encountered a segfault in fdupes. The commandline I used was: `fdupes -r -d -I .`. It prints the first match of a set of matches followed by the segfault: ``` [+]