Hi Adam,
On 18/12/20 at 08:46 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
>
> Hi Lucas!
>
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:39:08AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Source: memkind
>
> > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > >
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Hi Lucas!
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:39:08AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: memkind
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64.
>
> > I'm marking
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 01:27:11PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:39:08AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: memkind
> > Version: 1.10.1-1
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:39:08AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: memkind
> Version: 1.10.1-1
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64.
>
> I'm marking this bug as severity:serious since your package
Source: memkind
Version: 1.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on ppc64el. At the same time, it did not fail on amd64.
5 matches
Mail list logo
