Bug#976943: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-powerpc64le-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 160 github.com/seccomp/libsec

2020-12-24 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/issues/61 Control: severity -1 important On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 9:12 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 14/12/20 at 14:36 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > > > > > === RUN TestRuleAddAndLoad > > > seccomp_test.go:588:

Bug#976943: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-powerpc64le-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 160 github.com/seccomp/libsec

2020-12-24 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 14/12/20 at 14:36 -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > > === RUN TestRuleAddAndLoad > > seccomp_test.go:588: Syscall should have returned error code! > > --- FAIL: TestRuleAddAndLoad (0.00s) > > > Source code is here: >

Bug#976943: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-powerpc64le-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 160 github.com/seccomp/libsec

2020-12-14 Thread Reinhard Tartler
> === RUN TestRuleAddAndLoad > seccomp_test.go:588: Syscall should have returned error code! > --- FAIL: TestRuleAddAndLoad (0.00s) Source code is here: https://sources.debian.org/src/golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang/0.9.1-2/seccomp_test.go/#L529-L589 This test is basically

Bug#976943: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang: FTBFS on ppc64el (arch:all-only src pkg): dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-powerpc64le-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 160 github.com/seccomp/libsec

2020-12-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang Version: 0.9.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on ppc64el Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201209 ftbfs-bullseye ftbfs-ppc64el Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on ppc64el. At the same