On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 22:59:31 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Some quick thoughts:
> > - OOC: Is gnupg1 going away, or what is the reason for this proposal?
> I have asked about this, but nobody is really pushing for gnupg1 to
> go away. However, it currently FTBFS, so lets see if it will be
* gregor herrmann [201215 23:37]:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:43:26 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>
> > a very long time ago, Build-Depends were changed so gnupg1 is explicitly
> > used, due to CPAN RT#112569. However, upstream has apparently fixed the
> > tests in 0.0019 - this is noted in the
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 22:43:26 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> a very long time ago, Build-Depends were changed so gnupg1 is explicitly
> used, due to CPAN RT#112569. However, upstream has apparently fixed the
> tests in 0.0019 - this is noted in the same RT bug.
> Please consider switching the
Package: src:libconfig-identity-perl
Version: 0.0019-1
Severity: normal
Dear Perl Maintainers,
a very long time ago, Build-Depends were changed so gnupg1 is explicitly
used, due to CPAN RT#112569. However, upstream has apparently fixed the
tests in 0.0019 - this is noted in the same RT bug.
4 matches
Mail list logo
