Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 25 January 2021 at 09:17, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi | | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 18:06, Graham Inggs wrote: | > I'm awaiting autopkgtest results on the binNMU'd r-cran-tmb. I will | > update this bug and #980809 when they are in. | | The autopkgtests for r-cran-tmb [1] and r-cran-glmmtmb [2]

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 18:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > I'm awaiting autopkgtest results on the binNMU'd r-cran-tmb. I will > update this bug and #980809 when they are in. The autopkgtests for r-cran-tmb [1] and r-cran-glmmtmb [2] have completed on all architectures except for s390x, which are

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 24 January 2021 at 18:06, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Dirk | | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 14:47, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > R code can promote warnings to errors on a per-session basis: | | Thanks! This could be useful in the r-cran-tmb autopkgtest. | | > I am still not quite sure

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Howdy, On 24 January 2021 at 18:01, Graham Inggs wrote: | Hi Andreas | | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 09:55, Andreas Tille wrote: | > dh-r injects versioned dependencies if this is specified in the | > DESCRIPTION file of an r-* package. If this is not specified we | > need to add this manually

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Hi Graham, On 24 January 2021 at 17:53, Graham Inggs wrote: | On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 07:10, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > There is a confusion here. You filed this again rmatrix (aka "Matrix"). | > Matrix does not impose dependencies -- dependent packages do. | | I filed against rmatrix, as

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 14:47, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > R code can promote warnings to errors on a per-session basis: Thanks! This could be useful in the r-cran-tmb autopkgtest. > I am still not quite sure what the best way here is. With hard '==' warnings > we get ourselves the need

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Andreas On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 09:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > dh-r injects versioned dependencies if this is specified in the > DESCRIPTION file of an r-* package. If this is not specified we > need to add this manually (which I can do - but for sure the > automatic solution would be more

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Dirk On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 07:10, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > There is a confusion here. You filed this again rmatrix (aka "Matrix"). > Matrix does not impose dependencies -- dependent packages do. I filed against rmatrix, as this was the package that started this "transition". Also, I

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 24 January 2021 at 06:08, Graham Inggs wrote: | The actual warning message is generated by r-base, is there a way to | make this an error instead of a warning? R code can promote warnings to errors on a per-session basis: > warning("I am just a warning") Warning message: I am just

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 06:08:52AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > I will schedule a binNMU for r-cran-tmb for now, but it still needs > the versioned dependency added. Is this something that dh-r could do? dh-r injects versioned dependencies if this is specified in the DESCRIPTION file of an r-*

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Graham, On 24 January 2021 at 06:08, Graham Inggs wrote: | Source: rmatrix | Version: 1.3-2-1 | Severity: important | Control: affects -1 src:r-cran-tmb | X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org | | Hi R Maintainers There is a confusion here. You filed this again rmatrix (aka "Matrix").

Bug#980902: rmatrix: which reverse dependencies need rebuilds?

2021-01-23 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: rmatrix Version: 1.3-2-1 Severity: important Control: affects -1 src:r-cran-tmb X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org Hi R Maintainers While investigating #980809 [1], I found the following output in the autopkgtest logs of and r-cran-glmmtmb and r-cran-tmb: Warning message: In