Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2022-01-31 Thread Charles
Dear Jose > So who want to help me ... ? I want to help you. > Does the email address logch...@packages.debian.org still work? From https://www.debian.org/contact "If you simply want to communicate with the maintainer of a Debian package, then you can use the special mail aliases set up for

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-12-29 Thread Richard Lewis
In case it helps, i have pushed some commits here https://salsa.debian.org/rpil2/logcheck eg people might want to reuse the autopkgtest or changes to postinst/postrm which make it "piuparts clean". Or not. this is not a request to maintain logcheck or to merge anything into debian - merely an

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-12-08 Thread Richard Lewis
great idea - is there anyone who will merge (good, sensible) contributions? it seems there are many people interested in this RFA over the years but no-one who has the ability (ie a DD) to do the final merge/upload. regatdless, let's not have a competition but get many people involved (im sure

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-12-08 Thread Charles
This RFA is progressing slowly. Do I rightly understand that it is Hannes' who is to choose the new maintainers? It must be difficult to choose, knowing little about us volunteers. Can we progress by having each of the volunteers work on one of the current bugs? That would usefully fix

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-12-07 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:13:30PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > Sorry for no reply until now. I was busy with issues on work and > personal life. I am happy to adopt logcheck. I am not a user of irc, > there was any discussion on IRC that I should know? No, there were no discussions on

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-12-02 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote: > @Jose Do you still plan to adopt logcheck? You might want to collaborate > with Richard and Charles to maintain the package all together. @Jose Can you please report back if you still want to maintain logcheck? Best regards

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-10-10 Thread Charles
Hi On 10/10/2021 22:09, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote: @Jose Do you still plan to adopt logcheck? You might want to collaborate with Richard and Charles to maintain the package all together. Is there an email list to enable collaboration and discussion? You can use the #logcheck channel on the

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-10-10 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Hi, On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 02:42:07PM +0530, Charles wrote: > I would like to adopt the logcheck package On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:10:16PM +0100, R Lewis wrote: > Very keen to keep logcheck in the distribution and looking to get involved > in Debian (spare time only). > > happy to submit

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-09-24 Thread Charles
I would like to adopt the logcheck package I have Debian packaging experience, ref https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983146 I am * A long time user of logcheck * Author of https://redmine.auroville.org.in/projects/public-pages/wiki/Logcheck * Maintainer of

Bug#981446: RFA: logcheck -- mails anomalies in the system logfiles to the administrator

2021-01-31 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would like to put the logcheck package up for adoption. I haven't been using the package for years. If no one speaks up, I eventually will move on with orphaning the package. Feel free to contact me with any questions. The package description is: Logcheck helps