Bug#982309: Session-Interactive-Only: no is equivalent to Session-Interactive-Only: yes

2023-08-16 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes: Lucas> When using config snippets in /usr/share/pam-configs/, it Lucas> seems that 'Session-Interactive-Only: no' is equivalent to Lucas> 'Session-Interactive-Only: yes'. I'm not going to fix in this upload, because I don't have time to test a

Bug#982309: Session-Interactive-Only: no is equivalent to Session-Interactive-Only: yes

2021-02-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/02/21 at 20:11 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes: > > Lucas> When using config snippets in /usr/share/pam-configs/, it > Lucas> seems that 'Session-Interactive-Only: no' is equivalent to > Lucas> 'Session-Interactive-Only: yes'. > > I think

Bug#982309: Session-Interactive-Only: no is equivalent to Session-Interactive-Only: yes

2021-02-15 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes: Lucas> When using config snippets in /usr/share/pam-configs/, it Lucas> seems that 'Session-Interactive-Only: no' is equivalent to Lucas> 'Session-Interactive-Only: yes'. I think we've missed the freeze deadline for fixing this in bullseye.

Bug#982309: Session-Interactive-Only: no is equivalent to Session-Interactive-Only: yes

2021-02-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: libpam-runtime Version: 1.3.1-5 Severity: normal Hi, When using config snippets in /usr/share/pam-configs/, it seems that 'Session-Interactive-Only: no' is equivalent to 'Session-Interactive-Only: yes'. pam-auth-update only look at the presence of the Session-Interactive-Only field,