Bug#983398: ZFS 2.0 update - buster

2021-03-03 Thread M. Zhou
Control: close -1 Hi Daniel and Mathias, Thanks for the confirmation. Neither did I manage to reproduce the issue in virtualbox according to that guide. On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 19:45 +0100, Daniel Garcia Sanchez wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > Thanks a lot! > > I tried an older version, 2.0.2. Maybe

Bug#983398: ZFS 2.0 update - buster

2021-03-03 Thread Daniel Garcia Sanchez
Hi Mathias, Thanks a lot! I tried an older version, 2.0.2. Maybe it didn't work for me because I used an old version or something else related to my system. Mo, could you close this bug? The update 0.8.6 -> 2.0.3 is working properly. Best, Daniel On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 2:52 PM Mathias Gibbens

Bug#983398: ZFS 2.0 update - buster

2021-03-03 Thread Mathias Gibbens
As another data point, I've successfully upgraded four buster installs from 0.8.6 -> 2.0.3 as packaged from the buster-backports repo. My setups are similar to Daniel's (ZFS as root filesystem, following the same install guide); one instance uses native ZFS encryption while the other three

Bug#983398: ZFS 2.0 update - buster

2021-02-23 Thread Daniel Garcia Sanchez
Hi Mo, Thanks for open the bug. On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 3:22 PM M. Zhou wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > Could you please briefly describe the configuration of your > ZFS so the others can try to reproduce the problem? I recently installed ZFS on root using the following guide:

Bug#983398: ZFS 2.0 update - buster

2021-02-23 Thread M. Zhou
Hi Daniel, On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 12:23 +0100, Daniel Garcia Sanchez wrote: > Yesterday the backports ZFS package was updated to 2.0. I have a > machine using ZFS as the root filesystem. After the update the > machine was not able to boot. I think it was the ZFS update that > caused the problem.