Hi Santiago,
On 22-03-2021 22:49, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
>>> Fixing a couple of nasty bugs discovered late,
>> Yes, due to handling of a new binary package that you had migrated into
>> bullseye the day before that wasn't allowed anymore exactly to avoid
>> this class of bugs.
>
>
I'm Ccing my fellows at the squid team in case they want to add something
here, for the full conversation, please see #985390.
I have finished testing the changes for -9, I don't know if I like it more
now or if it would be better to just leave the comment on the NEWS file and
don't echo anything
Hi again!
I have just pushed:
https://salsa.debian.org/squid-team/squid/-/commit/fe8a10ef8ec40411bb59bec7af2b179796d4f4ef
I think I'm addressing all your concerns there, if you like it I'll run
tests tomorrow and upload the -9 package.
Thanks in advance.
--
Manty/BestiaTester ->
> > Fixing a couple of nasty bugs discovered late,
> Yes, due to handling of a new binary package that you had migrated into
> bullseye the day before that wasn't allowed anymore exactly to avoid
> this class of bugs.
Agreed, this was something that several users had asked for and that we, the
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Santiago,
On 17-03-2021 09:01, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> Fixing a couple of nasty bugs discovered late,
Yes, due to handling of a new binary package that you had migrated into
bullseye the day before that wasn't allowed anymore exactly to avoid
this class of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package squid
Current version on tesing has two bugs (#984510 and #984880) they both
happen when purging squid after transitioning to squid-openssl or vice
versa. The first
6 matches
Mail list logo
