Bug#988908: plantuml: Can plantuml work with default-jre-headless?

2023-01-20 Thread Andrej Shadura
Control: forcemerge 927340 988908 Hi, On Wed, 18 Jan 2023, at 13:52, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Dear maintainer of plantuml. Did you have a chance to look at the > proposal to make the JDK dependency of plantuml more flexible? Would be > great if this could be solved before the next release

Bug#988908: plantuml: Can plantuml work with default-jre-headless?

2023-01-18 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Dear maintainer of plantuml. Did you have a chance to look at the proposal to make the JDK dependency of plantuml more flexible? Would be great if this could be solved before the next release of Debian. I use plantuml a lot, byt only non-interactively from the command line. -- Happy hacking

Bug#988908: plantuml: Can plantuml work with default-jre-headless?

2022-09-14 Thread Maximilian Stein
> Would it be possible to change this to also accept the headless version, > ie 'default-jre | default-jre-headless'? It would reduse the apt > download by 21.4 MiB and the disk footprint by 214 MiB. I'd like to second this. According to the PlantUML FAQ (https://plantuml.com/en/faq)

Bug#988908: plantuml: Can plantuml work with default-jre-headless?

2021-05-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: plantuml Version: 1:1.2018.13+ds-1 Tags: patch In https://github.com/arkivverket/noark5-tjenestegrensesnitt-standard/issues/272 > there is a discussion on running plantuml in a docker image without installing a lot of X11 related packages. I tracked this down to the dependency in