Hi Étienne
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 09:58:02AM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
>
> Yup, the bug entry was mostly a way for myself, and the others,
> to analyze and remember about that issue. I consider pushing
> changes today;
Very nice.
> I would also like to add a flag to enable debug
>
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille, on 2021-08-23:
> Hi Étienne,
>
> thanks a lot for your detailed analysis. You stumbled upon a pretty
> weak part of routine-update. For instance it is also not able to cope
> with watch files featuring the valid but in principle superfluous
> "uupdate debian". I'm
Hi Étienne,
thanks a lot for your detailed analysis. You stumbled upon a pretty
weak part of routine-update. For instance it is also not able to cope
with watch files featuring the valid but in principle superfluous
"uupdate debian". I'm currently busy with real life + DebConf
preparation (and
Package: routine-update
Version: 0.0.6
Severity: important
Hi Andreas,
when working on making sure the python-biopython watch file was
appropriately fixed, I saw routine-update choke with the
following error:
$ routine-update
gbp:info: Fetching from default remote for each
4 matches
Mail list logo
