On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:48:33 +0100 Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Untagging moreinfo as it should've been removed with the previous
message.
Is there a good reason for not including 32 bit in the architecture list?
FTBFS on arm64:
/usr/bin/gmake -f
Control -1 - moreinfo
On 31.10.21 19:09, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> Why don't you package the released version? Are there so many important
changes since release 5?
> If you only need specific changes, please add them as patches.
That's what I originally tried to do, but I had to add so many
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 31.10.21 19:03, Bastian Germann wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 21:51:50 +0200 Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
dynarmic (5+git20211012.cce7e4e+ds-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release. Closes: #995917
Why don't you package the
On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 21:51:50 +0200 Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
dynarmic (5+git20211012.cce7e4e+ds-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release. Closes: #995917
Why don't you package the released version? Are there so many important changes
since release 5?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dynarmic":
* Package name: dynarmic
Version : 5+git20211012.cce7e4e+ds-1
Upstream Author : MerryMage
* URL
5 matches
Mail list logo
