Hi,
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 7:48 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
> Thanks for the additional information.
>
> In my limited testing, mupdf-gl does not appear to function as well as
> mupdf. I can understand different people having a preference for one or
> the other.
I support that we
Hi Davide,
Thanks for the additional information.
In my limited testing, mupdf-gl does not appear to function as well as
mupdf. I can understand different people having a preference for one or
the other.
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> 2) a man page for mupdf-gl
Package: mupdf
Version: 1.22.2+ds1-2+b1
Followup-For: Bug #998002
X-Debbugs-Cc: davide.pr...@null.net
Hi,
mupdf-gl is the new executable, the mupdf script that call
the mupdf-x11 is for "old computer" (from upstream site).
You can find an helping page here:
Package: mupdf
Version: 1.19.0+ds1-1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, J-V Peetz
Dear Maintainer(s),
many thanks for your work on mupdf.
May I ask, what is the purpose of /usr/bin/mupdf-gl? The main script
/usr/bin/mupdf doesn't make use of it. The executable used in that script
is
4 matches
Mail list logo