Bug#789739: libdevel-ebug-perl: FTBFS in sid: test failures

Hi, On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:47:41PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > Control: retitle -1 libdevel-ebug-perl: FTBFS in sid: test failures > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:48:20PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:59:37 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > > > Source:

Bug#832115: konsole: Font size in konsole is very small and is difficult to read

Hi, did i respond right? I'm not really sure the Font is available AND i can configure and use it. I think (atm i'm not sure, but i will retest it) Andale Mono was configured first. So it is just not set in the config, it IS on the system. i will try to debug it, if i have any idea how to

Bug#832123: nmu: mksh util-vserver (dietlibc rdeps, security)

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hello, I recently uploaded a security update of dietlibc to sid (security and LTS teams for updates for (old)stable have been notified), and since it is a static library, some of the rdeps

Bug#831958: manpages-es-extra: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831958 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,10 +13,9 @@ clean: dh_clean -find man? -name '*~' -exec

Bug#831956: yocto-reader: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831956 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -57,12 +57,12 @@ install: build $(MAKE)

Bug#831968: jacksum: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831968 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ build-stamp: touch $@ binary: binary-indep

Bug#831964: pentium-builder: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831964 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -32,12 +32,12 @@ install: build dh_link usr/bin/builder-cc

Bug#831959: mrb: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831959 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -26,12 +26,12 @@ install: dh_install mrb usr/bin

Bug#831966: imediff2: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831966 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ install: build dh_clean -k dh_installdirs

Bug#831938: pyrex: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831938 + patch thanks On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > make: Nothing to be done for 'binary-indep'. > dpkg-genchanges --build=all >../pyrex_0.9.8.5-2.1_all.changes > dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot > distribute In this package,

Bug#832125: chromium: Chromium immediately crashes

Package: chromium Version: 51.0.2704.79-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I started chromium. It crashed immediately with SIGSEGV. dmesg(1) tells me: --- snib --- [153066.919129] chromium[15304]: segfault at 10 ip aa110788 sp bfb16160 error 4 in

Bug#831825: gcompris: Crash when i click on menu

I get the exact same crash, under sid amd64. It seems to have something to do with the sound. When the game starts it plays the intro music. As long as the music plays, I can click wherever I want with no crash. When the music finishes, if I click on anything (not just the menu) the game

Bug#831939: jailer: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831939 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ install: build # rename jailer.pl to jailer

Bug#831941: sylseg-sk: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831941 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ install: build cp -v sylseg-sk-training

Bug#831948: ftpwatch: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831948 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -26,13 +26,9 @@ clean: -rm -rf debian/tmp debian/files* core

Bug#831936: rcconf: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831936 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -47,12 +47,12 @@ install: build install -m 755 update-rcconf-guide

Bug#831943: cvs-mailcommit: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831943 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ debclean: rm -rf debian/tmp rm -f

Bug#831951: g2p-sk: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831951 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ install: build cp -v -r Exceptions

Bug#831949: ewipe: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831949 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -39,12 +39,12 @@ install: build install -m 644 viewer.tcl

Bug#831946: python-pcs: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831946 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ install: build dh_clean -k for python in

Bug#831954: libsnmp-mib-compiler-perl: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831954 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ binary-stamp: binary-indep binary-arch dh_testdir

Bug#830740: mrpt: FTBFS on hppa: parse_NMEA_RMC assertion failure

It's funny how some bad coding practices only show up in some particular archs... I fixed it and it's now uploaded to mentors: [1]. Hopefully you would be willing to upload it to unstable and see if this is the final fix! Best, JL [1]

Bug#832117: cfengine2: lock name collision with slow preceeding actions results in some rules not being performed

Package: cfengine2 Version: 2.2.10-5 Severity: normal Hi, So, first let me preface this with the understanding that cfengine2 is very old code and not being maintained anymore, so I'll understand if you don't accept the patches I'm proposing. However, since it isn't changing much, cfengine2

Bug#825756: [pkg-cinnamon] Bug#825756: Bug#825756: cinnamon-session: stopped using/working with gpg-agent

Hi Max, > You can always override the autostart desktop files adding a desktop > file to ~/.config/autostart/ with the same name and the content: > [Desktop Entry] > Hidden=true Oh, good to hear. Thanks a lot!!! > I've just tested this with gnome-keyring-ssh and this avoids the > gnome-keyring

Bug#829155: murrine-themes: Please split into separate packages

To be more specific, it looks like Ubuntu yakkety will likely upgrade to GTK 3.20 on Monday.[1] Therefore, I'd like to do these uploads in Ubuntu Sunday night or Monday. I'd feel more comfortable if the split would get at least a basic review in Debian first, since a major reason I'm working on

Bug#832103: docker.io: Can't run images after upgrading to 1.11.2~ds1-6

hey, > > downgrading to 1.11.2~ds1-5 and restart the daemon fixed the problem: > Did you try restarting the daemon before you downgraded? (and if not, > would you be willing to upgrade again and give it a shot?) I thought, that I restarted my machine in between. I gave it another try and

Bug#825390: Are you still interested in your maldetect RFS?

Dear Emily, Are you still interested in packaging maldetect for Debian? We generally close RFSs which have been reviewed, and where there is no response to the review, after six weeks. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

Hi, unless I didn't look careful enough I think we might still be missing the current_cert (and current_issuer) from the X509_STORE_CTX, as advertised in https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/doc/HOWTO/proxy_certificates.txt#L204 and used in e.g.

Bug#832098: transition: llvm-defaults

Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.8.html I have updated the tracker we already had for llvm 3.6. Emilio

Bug#831957: adzapper: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831957 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -55,12 +55,12 @@ install: build install -m 755 debian/adzapper2ab

Bug#813920: Patch removing "defined(....)"

tags + patch thanks Hiya, As suggested in the error message (Maybe you should just omit the defined()?), removing it seems to fix this. Removing brackets would end in a different error. Please find patch attached. Regards, Alberto -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta| Formación, consultoría y

Bug#832129: [wine-development]: RegEdit fails to export whole registry

Package: wine-development Version: 1.9.14-1 Severity: normal Hallo pkg-wine-party! During export of wines registry to a file regedit fails to export the complete registry. The console shows me this: # copy from my zsh terminal view - start # joerg@Pythagoras ~ % unset LANG

Bug#832119: unicorn: start script won't start if config file exists!

Package: unicorn Version: 5.0.1-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, there seems to be an error in /etc/init.d/unicorn which forbids to start unicorn if a config file exists (and not if it *not* exist). In lines 42--44 it reads if [ -s $CONFIG_RB ]; then exit_with_message "Unicorn

Bug#817586: Info received (most: diff for NMU version 5.0.0a-2.4)

On 2016-07-22 01:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Herman and I tried to re-arrange things so that my more thorough upload ended up in the archive, after 10 days, but I screwed up and accidentally did an immediate upload. Hopefully everyone is fine with this and no harm done. If the

Bug#825756: [pkg-cinnamon] Bug#825756: Bug#825756: Bug#825756: cinnamon-session: stopped using/working with gpg-agent

> It counts as GNOME. Umpf ... ok ... well ... that is what I wanted to escape ;-) Thanks, now I know how to circumvent things. Norbert -- PREINING Norbert + TeX Live & Debian Developer + http://www.preining.info GPG: 0x860CDC13fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

Bug#829155: murrine-themes: Please split into separate packages

On lun., 2016-07-18 at 07:50 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/jbicha-guest/blackbird-gtk-theme.git > / > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/jbicha-guest/greybird-gtk-theme.git/ Does that include the recent modifications done by Simon (I noticed you were

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

In addition to github PR 1294, there's now also PR 1339 which adds the function to set the EXFLAG_PROXY flag on a given certificate. Also, PR 1295 has been updated. Instead of a function that returns a lock, there is now a lock and an unlock function. To me, it seems that that covers what's

Bug#832127: libtest-aggregate-perl: Breaks with Test-Simple >= 1.3

Package: libtest-aggregate-perl Version: 0.372-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: not fit for release Forwarded: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=100035 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Test::Aggregate up to 0.373 doesn't work with the new Test-Simple

Bug#832101: pavucontrol configuration tab empty and other issues with pulseaudio 9

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 22 July 2016 at 06:08, bbuggreport@discard.email wrote: > Package: pulseaudio > Version: 9.0-1.1 > > > > The pavucontrol configuration tab is empty since update to pulseaudio 9 - on > two different pc! An error message is shown under this

Bug#831355: pulseaudio: Use module-udev-detect instead of module-detect

On 21 July 2016 at 21:43, Sean Laguna wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:08:52 -0400 Felipe Sateler > wrote: >> On 15 July 2016 at 03:51, Francois Mescam wrote: >> > Thanks after installing pulseaudio-module-udev the message

Bug#832121: less: a typo in 481-1 broke lesspipe ddeb support

Package: less Version: 481-2.1 Severity: normal In 481-1, this diff was introduced for ipk support: - *.deb|*.udeb|*.ddeb) + *.deb|*.udeb|*.ddebi|*.ipk) Obviously, there was a vi-induced stray 'i' that accidentally turned 'ddeb' into 'ddebi', which

Bug#832115: konsole: Font size in konsole is very small and is difficult to read

The default font used by konsole is the Mono font configured in the system settings, I think that the current default Monospace, that should be provided by dejavu mono, which is the default font in Debian. If by some reason you don't have the font that's configured in the system settings then

Bug#832094: texlive-all: please package tex4ht from texlive

Hi Mattia, >> Because of this I personally think it would be great to have >integrated tex4ht >> in the Debian TeXLive distribution. I agree, but would need some support dealing with the Java stuff, as I don't have any experience how to do that. TL simple ships the provided jars, which is a

Bug#832118: ruby-puppet-forge: FTBFS: psych.rb:471:in `initialize': No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - /usr/lib/ruby/locales/config.yaml (Errno::ENOENT)

Source: ruby-puppet-forge Version: 2.2.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, ruby-puppet-forge fails to build from source in

Bug#825756: [pkg-cinnamon] Bug#825756: Bug#825756: Bug#825756: cinnamon-session: stopped using/working with gpg-agent

It counts as GNOME. On July 22, 2016 4:09:24 PM GMT+02:00, Norbert Preining wrote: >Hi Max, > >> You can always override the autostart desktop files adding a desktop >> file to ~/.config/autostart/ with the same name and the content: >> [Desktop Entry] >> Hidden=true > >Oh,

Bug#832124: gitlab: install fails with: Could not find gem 'devise (>= 3.5.4, ~> 3.5)'

Package: gitlab Version: 8.8.2+dfsg-5 Severity: normal Hi, I tried to install gitlab in a minimal stretch VM. It fails in the first run: Creating/updating gitlab user account... sent invalidate(passwd) request, exiting sent invalidate(group) request, exiting sent invalidate(passwd) request,

Bug#825390: Are you still interested in your maldetect RFS?

Please don't close it. I have had some unusual challenges since May but I do want to do this work. Emily On Friday, July 22, 2016, Sean Whitton wrote: > Dear Emily, > > Are you still interested in packaging maldetect for Debian? We > generally close RFSs which have

Bug#832128: freespace2: Bad symlinks /usr/games/fs2_open{,_DEBUG}

Package: freespace2 Version: 3.7.2+repack-1+b1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The current package contains symlinks such as /usr/games/fs2_open -> fs2_open_3.7.2+repack-1+b1 where the target doesn't exist. /usr/games/fs2_open_3.7.2 does exist so it seems likely that the build/maintainer

Bug#827740: isympy start fails: No module named sympy.interactive

severity 827740 serious tags 827740 + patch thanks Raising to "serious", because the package dependencies can be resolved in a way that does not allow the package to be usable. (§3.5) Attached is a patch that at least fixes the immediate problem of incorrect dependencies. Longer-term, I think

Bug#812022: traverso: FTBFS with GCC 6: flexible array member...

Hi, The package has been removed from testing even though a patch was proposed 6 months ago, so I'm wondering: what's the status here? Cheers, -- intrigeri

Bug#805002: libvirt-client: "virsh attach-disk" fails with AppArmor enabled

Control: reassign -1 apparmor Control: affects -1 libvirt-daemon Dear apparmor maintainers, On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:32:15AM +, Carlo Rengo wrote: > Package: libvirt-client > Version: 1.2.21-1 > Severity: serious > > Dear Maintainer, > > Running “virsh attach-disk ” with AppArmor

Bug#831952: thp: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831952 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -51,12 +51,12 @@ install: build cp -aR lib/

Bug#815776: bts

retitle 815776 git: new upstream version 2.9.2 thanks * Daniel Baumann [Fri Jun 17, 2016 at 07:50:06AM +0200]: > it would be nice to get 2.9.0. In the meanwhile we have v2.9.2 since middle of July and we're stuck with 2.8.1 in Debian unstable since April. Is there anything specific preventing

Bug#832120: ardour3: could not create project in "/home/rouven/Ardour/blablabla"

Package: ardour3 Version: 3.5.403~dfsg-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, i can't use the program because it is not able to create the projectfiles. it wont start without setting up a projekt first. i think it is a permissions problem. if i start ardour3 with root privileges it can create the

Bug#831955: gpsim-doc: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: dpkg-genchanges: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; cannot distribute

tags 831955 + patch thanks This happens because debian/rules has its binary-arch and binary-indep targets swapped. The following trivial (but untested) patch might fix it. Note: The patch also fixes the non-standard binary-arch-indep target name. Thanks.--- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@

Bug#832126: python-pytest-xdist: python3-pytest-xdist missing

Package: python-pytest-xdist Version: 1.8-0.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Currently there is a python-pytest-xdist but no python3-pytest-xdist. The package on PyPI claims to be Python 3 compatible which implies Debian should have a python3-... package for this. -- System Information:

Bug#832103: docker.io: Can't run images after upgrading to 1.11.2~ds1-6

On 22 July 2016 at 03:40, Sandro Knauß wrote: > downgrading to 1.11.2~ds1-5 and restart the daemon fixed the problem: Did you try restarting the daemon before you downgraded? (and if not, would you be willing to upgrade again and give it a shot?) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F

Bug#832122: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.8+ds-1 -- lightweight and secure socks5 proxy

package: sponsorship-requests severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com, max.c...@gmail.com, 073p...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shadowsocks-libev" * Package name: shadowsocks-libev Version : 2.4.8+ds-1 Upstream Author : Max

Bug#829272: Missing accessors

Hi, Good point, I'll look into that. Also, thanks for the reminder, that HOWTO needs a rewrite, badly. Cheers Richard On Fri Jul 22 15:51:16 2016, msa...@nikhef.nl wrote: > Hi, > > unless I didn't look careful enough I think we might still be missing > the current_cert (and

Bug#804622: -x auth_info is a required parameter, at least with SQL

On 22 Jul 2016, at 04:44, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Timo Sirainen [2016-07-22 09:51 +0200]: >> pgsql: Query failed, aborting: SELECT p.userid, p.password, u.uid AS >> userdb_uid, u.gid AS userdb_gid, u.home AS userdb_home, u.mail AS >>

Bug#832101: Installing pulseaudio-module-udev

so easy... thanks!

Bug#813920: Second (additional) patch

Hullo, Please find attached a patch to fix the following error on gnupod_addsong: $ gnupod_addsong Can't use a hash as a reference at /usr/share/perl5/GNUpod/FileMagic.pm line 365 Regards, Alberto -- Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta| Formación, consultoría y soporte técnico mailto/sip:

Bug#829360: closed by Jan Mojžíš <jan.moj...@gmail.com> (Bug#829360: fixed in dq 20160720-1)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 16:57:13 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the dqcache-run package: > > #829360: dqcache-run: priority is standard but depends on optional packages > > It has been closed by Jan

Bug#832133: Checklist for uploading new versions

On 07/22/2016 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The failure you quoted is about a strict dependency. Do you know if it's > justified? The changes on ruby-json's side are fairly small. Also it > seems that the strict dependency was dropped from the gemspec (it's not > there anymore in version 1.0.2

Bug#830660: liblept5: hardcoded predictable paths in /tmp

On 22.07.2016 19:19, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > There are additional hardcoded paths in the Leptonica > library itself, but generally on debugging or regression test code paths. > I will continue working with upstream on this topic. Are you sure? Looking at convertTiffMultipageToPS() from

Bug#829188: SEGVs too frequently (~every other day)

Severity: important thanks On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:43:33AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Package: icedove > Version: 1:45.1.0-1 > Severity: serious decreasing the severity to important. The package isn't violating the Debian policy nor the package is unsuitable for release.

Bug#831170: qjackctl: FTBFS with GCC 6: cstdlib:75:25: fatal error: stdlib.h: No such file or directory

[Lucas Nussbaum] > During a rebuild of all packages in sid using the gcc-defaults package > available in experimental to make GCC default to version 6, your package > failed > to build on amd64. For more information about GCC 6 and Stretch, see: > - https://wiki.debian.org/GCC6 > -

Bug#832133: Checklist for uploading new versions

On 07/22/2016 11:50 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I think the solution is to build rails on a system which still has > ruby-json 1.8.3 and upload that version to archive. > I have built rails locally without strict dependency on ruby-json. If someone can confirm its okay to upload, I can upload

Bug#830672: Pending fixes for bugs in the golang-github-azure-go-autorest package

tag 830672 + pending thanks Some bugs in the golang-github-azure-go-autorest package are closed in revision 9b6c0859ba2a0bdb6ca5822ec40e6f49a3445632 in branch 'master' by Martín Ferrari The full diff can be seen at

Bug#831985: [patch] fix default for 'prio' in manpage

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Control: tag -1 +pending, fixed-upstream Hello Vincent, THank you for your patch and care for ensuring documentation is intact. With today's release of 0.6.2, your patch did not apply. As it looks, all of what you reported was corrected upstream

Bug#831749: mini-buildd: Unable to build any package due to missing gnupg in chroot environment of sid/stretch

Hi Boyuan, On Di, 2016-07-19 at 09:44 +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Source: mini-buildd > Version: 1.0.12 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > > On newly deployed mini-buildd, the default chroot environment for > stretch/sid > lacks gpg/gpg2. > As a result, `apt-key` cannot run and causes

Bug#829756: RM: iceowl-l10n -- ROM; Package included in icedove now

Hi Scott, On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:55:08AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, July 05, 2016 09:31:45 PM Guido Günther wrote: > > Package: ftp.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > I've gone ahead and done this removal, but it appears to affect some > metapackages: > > Checking reverse

Bug#832132: /etc/init.d/radicale start does not work

Package: radicale Version: 0.9-1+deb8u1 If I run `radicale -d` as root myself, it works fine. But if I run `/etc/init.d/radicale start` as root, it claims to be using a systemd service file and then does nothing. I cannot find said systemd service file -- can it be that it was not created

Bug#812022: traverso: FTBFS with GCC 6: flexible array member...

Control: tags -1 - patch Hi, On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 15:31 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > The package has been removed from testing even though a patch was > proposed 6 months ago, so I'm wondering: what's the status here? Not sure why nothing happened, but the package still FTBFS with gcc 6

Bug#832134: ifupdown: Multiple dhclient processes started

Package: ifupdown Version: 0.7.53.1 Severity: normal Hi, With the jessie version, with the following configuration, I get one dhclient process started as expected: allow-hotplug eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp On the same machine, when changing the configuration to, I get 3 dhclient processes, one

Bug#829155: murrine-themes: Please split into separate packages

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Does that include the recent modifications done by Simon (I noticed you were > active on github issue #120 so I guess so). Also, I'm not sure debian/watch is > really working: how do you rebuild orig here? Can you

Bug#832135: gcc-5: building liburcu on alpha crashes gcc

Package: gcc-5 Version: 5.4.0-6 According to this buildd log https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=liburcu=alpha=0.9.2-3=1467933496 attempting to build liburcu 0.9.2-3 on alpha makes gcc 5.4.0-6 crash with an internal compiler error (could not split insn). I don't have access to an

Bug#260511: inventor: ivview/SoXtExaminerViewer popup menu only comes up once

Hi Maintainer This problem should have gone away in 2.1.5-10-17 when we switched from lesstif2 to motif. Regards Graham

Bug#832136: dnsdist is missing an init.d script

Package: dnsdist Version: 1.0.0-2 Severity: normal There is no /etc/init.d/dnsdist and /etc/default/dnsdist files in the package. Packages are not supposed only to support that systemd crud. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500,

Bug#832137: When selection option index 0 (Burn ISO) from the ISO Menu, nothing happens. The other menus seem to work.

Package: bashburn Version: 3.0.1-2 Severity: important Greetings, The subject actually says it all. This bug makes bashburn unsuitable to burn ISO images. Sincerely Filippo -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,

Bug#783210: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

Ximin Luo: > Aurelien Jarno: >> On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno >>> wrote: It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only one left to address in the version currently in

Bug#817586: Info received (most: diff for NMU version 5.0.0a-2.4)

> Hopefully everyone is fine with this and no harm done. If the > maintainer wants any changes I'm happy to re-upload. I can take a look and make any changes in my own upload. Later, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill http://mako.cc/ Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as

Bug#830660: liblept5: hardcoded predictable paths in /tmp

No, I'm not sure. Leptonica is big and requires a thorough review in conjunction with upstream. Thank you for helping identify convertTiffMultipageToPS(), and please report anything else you happen to notice on mainline paths. Highly appreciated.

Bug#817373: bb: Removal of debhelper compat 4

Hi, On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:32:24PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Uwe: Feel free to tell me if I should fast-forward it or if I should > delay it longer. Feel free to fast-forward / NMU, looks good to me from a quick glance. > P.S.: Uwe: Do you want a co-maintainer for bb? Sure, feel free

Bug#832088: sed: silently fails with -n option specified first

On 22/07/2016 09:02, Daniel Iancu wrote: > Package: sed > Version: 4.2.2-4+b1 > Severity: normal > > Sed silently fails when -n option is specified first and leaves > the file blank. Thus resulting in the loss of the file contents. > Example: > # cd /tmp > echo 'foo' > test > sed

Bug#832133: Checklist for uploading new versions

On 07/22/2016 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > yesterday on IRC: > 23:29 < lucas> long time without doing any ruby packaging, let's hope I > didn't break the world > > Looks like I did :/ I guessed :) > The failure you quoted is about a strict dependency. Do you know if it's >

Bug#829604: Bug reported upstream

forwarded 829604 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71975

Bug#832138: librostlab-blast: The package should compile without forcing the older -std=c++03

Source: librostlab-blast Version: 1.0.1-7 Severity: wishlist The package should either be refactored to work around #829604 in g++, or we have to wait thill that bug is fixed. Best, Gert -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500,

Bug#832133: Checklist for uploading new versions

On 07/22/2016 11:46 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 07/22/2016 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> The failure is at: >> ruby-activesupport : Depends: ruby-json (< 2.0) but 2.0.1+dfsg-1 is to >> be installed > > I tried relaxing the requirement in rails package and build, but it > fails to build

Bug#783210: glibc: please make the package build reproducibly

X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org +CC Mike Frysinger Aurelien Jarno: > On 2016-06-06 02:48, Ximin Luo wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:11:25 +0200 Aurelien Jarno >> wrote: >>> It means that the point 3 (usage of __DATE__ and __TIME__) is the only

Bug#824867: lightproof: add support for pt-BR

reassign 824867 src:libreoffice-dictionaries retitle 824867 package pt-BR lightproof tag 824867 + pending thanks On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Integrating VERO Lightproof rules for pt-BR into LightProof main package and > > make it a suggested package for

Bug#832110: libjs-c3: c3.css missing from install

Hi Mathias, On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Mathias Behrle wrote: > thanks for packaging c3. You are welcome. I've plans to use it in a project of mine, but it will need time. :( > c3.css (also existant in the debian directory of the source tarball, so > probably

Bug#832133: ruby-json 2.0 broke rails: metabug to prevent testing migration

package: ruby-json version: 2.0.1+dfsg-1 severity: grave ruby-json upload just broke rails and a whole lot of dependencies. The following packages have unmet dependencies: ruby-activesupport : Depends: ruby-json (< 2.0) but 2.0.1+dfsg-1 is to be installed One sample failure

Bug#762829: file: Pascal modules (ISO 10206) wrongly classified as text/x-ruby

Hi, I realise now I was not subscribed to the bug, so format/linkage of this reply might be a bit of a mess. Sorry! > To improve the situation without breaking detection of other text > file types, I need a fine selection of typical pascal programs. Not > necessarily a big number but a huge

Bug#832131: apt-file: non-existent apt-file cache path

Package: apt-file Version: 3.0 Severity: important Following the documentaiton I have configured apt-file to run the old way, i.e. only update its database on explicit request. Post configuration, I ran an apt-file update and saw the following error: rrs@learner:/usr/share/doc/apt-file$ sudo

Bug#824928: letsencrypt.sh: move the default position of the domains file to /etc/letsencrypt.sh/

shame on me. I've been quite busy over the last month, due to university exam stuff (and will be in vacation next week), but I had some spare cycles now so I looked at this. On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:47:56AM +0200, Daniel Beyer wrote: > I pushed changes to this new branch (based on current

Bug#832133: Checklist for uploading new versions

On 07/22/2016 11:22 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > The failure is at: > ruby-activesupport : Depends: ruby-json (< 2.0) but 2.0.1+dfsg-1 is to > be installed I tried relaxing the requirement in rails package and build, but it fails to build because of circular dependencies :( signature.asc

Bug#832134: ifupdown: Multiple dhclient processes started

On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 19:33:19 +0200 Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Hi, > > With the jessie version, with the following configuration, I get one > dhclient process started as expected: > > allow-hotplug eth0 > iface eth0 inet dhcp > > On the same machine, when changing the

Bug#830660: liblept5: hardcoded predictable paths in /tmp

On 22.07.2016 20:23, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > No, I'm not sure. Leptonica is big and requires a thorough review in > conjunction with upstream. Thank you for helping identify > convertTiffMultipageToPS(), and please report anything else you > happen to notice on mainline paths. Highly

Bug#832134: ifupdown: Multiple dhclient processes started

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 07:33:19PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > With the jessie version, with the following configuration, I get one > dhclient process started as expected: > > allow-hotplug eth0 > iface eth0 inet dhcp > > On the same machine, when changing the configuration to, I get 3 >

  1   2   3   >