Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for reporting this issue.
sfcgal tends to fail when cgal is updated, unfortunately those updates
are not coordinated with its rdeps.
It looks like upstream addressed this issue by removing the garden tests:
Package: fonttools
Version: 4.29.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-fo...@lists.debian.org
Control: block 1005477 by -1
Control: block 1005474 by -1
This package has missing dependency of python package name
"unicodedata2" since version 4.29.1-1, according to the
Source: apertium-isl-eng
Version: 0.1.0~r66083-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-eo-en
Version: 1.0.0~r63833-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: irony-mode
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: apertium-oc-es
Version: 1.0.6~r57551-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-eu-en
Version: 0.3.1~r56205-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: cvise
Version: 2.4.0-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: myst-parser
Version: 0.16.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
myst-parser is not migrating to testing because of a failing autopkgtest on
i386 and armhf, see below.
This is also blocking testing migration of other packages such as primecountpy
and sagemath.
Best wishes,
Tobias
Source: ccls
Version: 0.20210330-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: lexicon
Version: 3.3.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: sorl-thumbnail
Version: 12.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apertium-es-ro
Version: 0.7.3~r57551-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: grunt
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: haskell-cairo
Version: 0.13.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-fr-es
Version: 0.9.2~r61322-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: cadvisor
Version: 0.38.7+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apertium-mk-en
Version: 0.1.1~r57554-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-eu-es
Version: 0.3.3~r56159-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Regarding the following, written by "Jamie Zawinski" on 2022-02-12 at 09:55 Uhr
-0800:
Also this is far from the only problem with XInput2's keyboard
event handling. See the comments in xscreensaver/driver/xinput.c
for a laundry list of its bugs.
Why did you switch to it? Or am I
Public upstream bug reports:
https://github.com/openscad/openscad/issues/4037
https://github.com/openscad/openscad/issues/4043
Control: retitle -1 gnome-dictionary: FTBFS: ../data/appdata/meson.build:3:5:
ERROR: Function does not take positional arguments
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 08:00:46 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ../data/appdata/meson.build:3:5: ERROR: Function does not take positional
> > arguments.
This (just
Control: reassign -1 src:llvm-toolchain-13
Control: retitle -1 target "RemoteIndexProto" references nonexistent file
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 01:40:00PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > CMake Error at /usr/lib/llvm-13/lib/cmake/clang/ClangTargets.cmake:737
> > (message):
> > The imported
Source: wxpython4.0
Version: 4.0.7+dfsg-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-tooz
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-public-suffix
Version: 4.0.6+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 08:16:32 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: chromium
> Version: 98.0.4758.80-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
Source: perl6-zef
Version: 0.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-leaflet-rails
Version: 1.6.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sqlmodel
Version: 0.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-handlebars-assets
Version: 2:0.23.8+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: python-novaclient
Version: 2:17.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: zurl
Version: 1.11.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: ruby-markdown-it-html5-embed
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gutenprint
Version: 5.3.3-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-turbolinks-source
Version: 5.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Seems that a dependency (tenacity) has been changed with broken api
Need to change code to use new tenacity version
Le dim. 13 févr. 2022, 08:21, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: biomaj3-download
> Version: 3.2.4-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User:
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for minidlna (versioned as 1.3.0+dfsg-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers,
Flo
diff -Nru minidlna-1.3.0+dfsg/debian/changelog minidlna-1.3.0+dfsg/debian/changelog
---
Source: lua-luaossl
Version: 20161214-1
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/wahern/luaossl/issues/195
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
| In
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 05:15:16PM +0800, Yao Wei wrote:
> Package: fonttools
> Version: 4.29.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.5
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-fo...@lists.debian.org
> Control: block 1005477 by -1
> Control: block 1005474 by -1
>
> This package has missing dependency of
Hi Thomas,
On 29/12/21 at 12:07 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce the FTBFS. I'm using a normal sbuild
> environment, so I don't see what's different from your build. Any clue?
As suggested in the bug report, can you start by diffing your build log
with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Gilbey
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-untangle
Version : 1.1.1+git20200807.fb916a9
Upstream Author : Christian Stefanescu
* URL :
Hi Roger,
On 17/01/22 at 00:56 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> control: tags -1 +moreinfo unreproducible
> control: severity -1 important
>
> Dear Lucas,
>
> Thanks for the report!
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
>
> However, I cannot
Source: ring
Version: 20210112.2.b757bac~ds1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid bookworm
Hello,
ring currently build-depends against libargon2-0-dev that is now a
virtual package.
Could you please switch to libargon2-dev instead?
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian
The current upstream release is 1.5.2.
It would be good to have 1.5.2. in Debian, as SDCC is about to release
4.2.0, and for the pic14 and pic16 backends, SDCC only supports the
devices supported by the gputils present during the build of SDCC. So
there is a benefit in getting a newer gputils
Source: python-argon2
Version: 21.1.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid bookworm
Hello,
python-argon2 currently build-depends against libargon2-0-dev that is now a
virtual package.
Could you please switch to libargon2-dev instead?
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian
Source: opendht
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid bookworm
Hello,
opendht currently build-depends against libargon2-0-dev that is now a
virtual package.
Could you please switch to libargon2-dev to libargon2-dev instead?
Kind regards,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Hello.
In Debian stable we try to have stable packages. But volume-control-applet is
not stable and crashes.
Despite the logs I sent earlier, here is a way to reproduce the problem:
- Connect a bluetooth speaker.
- Switch the main output of pulseaudio to the speaker.
- Play a media (web browser
Source: squid
Version: 5.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5133
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
|
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:27:33AM +0100, Frédéric Pierret wrote:
> I fully agree on removing the RPM patch that causes all of our issues on
> packages depending on it. If needed, I'm willing to be part of reviewing
> what would be the impact of returning to a standard RPM package on Debian
> and
Package: samba
Version: 2:4.13.13+dfsg-1~deb11u2
Severity: critical
Tags: patch upstream
Please see https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2022-February/239548.html and
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2022-February/239577.html for the
description of the problem and how serious can it be,
Dear pydoctor maintainers,
> > > Tag <>
> > > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/web/_flatten.py", line
> > > 321, in _flattenTree
> > > element = next(stack[-1])
> > > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/web/_flatten.py", line
> > > 237, in _flattenElement
> > >
Am 13.02.2022 um 13:11 teilte Philip Wyett mit:
Hi,
Sorry if my note has confused. Imported into salsa, but still needs
the source only upload as I am not a DM and still need others to
upload. MAybe an appropriate time for me to go for DM?
DM's can have uploads permits for specific packages,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
[ Reason ]
User request in #976334
[ Impact ]
Typeahead search in the file chooser (File -> Save As... dialog) doesn't
work on
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 13:44:37 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
Ugh, actually attached now.
smcv
diffstat for gtk+3.0-3.24.24 gtk+3.0-3.24.24
debian/changelog |8 +
debian/control
Source: cgal
Version: 5.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs upstream
Justification: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so
Control: affects -1 src:sfcgal
Dear Maintainer,
sfcgal (1.4.1-2) FTBFS on mipsel due to an issue in cgal (5.4-1):
/usr/include/CGAL/Lazy_exact_nt.h:602:
On 13/02/2022 08:50, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: node-css-tree
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Package: linux-headers-4.19-amd64
Severity: normal
Hi , on my opinion PAGE_SIZE and per cpu variable is not compatible.
On my system i replaced DEFINE_PER_CPU_PAGE_ALIGNED with DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED
on alls iterations.
Application dmidecode report on cache L1 24kB/64 result integer .Alls action
control: reassign -1 pydoctor
control: force-merge 1005338 -1
control: affcts -1 git-buildpackage
thanks
Hi Lucas,
> > Tag <>
> > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/web/_flatten.py", line 321,
> > in _flattenTree
> > element = next(stack[-1])
> > File
--
How Are You,
I'm Mr. Ali Moses, how are you doing hope you are in good health, the
Board director try to reach you on phone several times Meanwhile, your
number was not connecting. before he ask me to send you an email to
hear from you if you are fine. hoping to hear from you soonest.
Thanks
I suspect the following:
in 1.0.0.rc16-10 /usr/lib/libdmraid.so is a dangling symlink to
/lib/libdmraid.so.1.0.0.rc16 (yay for those pointless split-usr
shenanigans, can we please have merged-usr like yesterday) and as a
result the compiler/linker falls back to link
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Subject: ITP: r-cran-spatstat.random -- Random Generation Functionality for the
'spatstat' Family
Package: wnpp
Owner: Nilesh Patra
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-spatstat.random
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Adrian Baddeley,
* URL
> This has been open for almost 2 days now. Is there a workaround for this bug?
I used `dpkg --force-depends ...` to install the nvidia packages I needed
alongside the current version of Xorg and all has been working fine for the
past few days. If there is a difference in the ABI, it hasn't
Package: wpasupplicant
X-Debbugs-Cc: tho...@glanzmann.de
Version: 2:2.9.0-23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hello,
wpa_supplicant.conf(5) manpage includes multiple examples with group wheel.
Group wheel does not exist on Debian as a result the example fails. It should
either be changed to root or
Hello,
Le 2/13/22 à 09:00, Mihai Moldovan a écrit :
I'm pretty sure that we can, at some point in the future, drop the offending
patch from the RPM package and all of this will be redundant. It just requires a
bit of work to make sure that older use cases (mostly alien) don't break due to
Source: openscad
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Upstream has reported two out-of-bounds memory access bugs, which have been
assigned CVEs:
Hi Graham,
This issue is again specific to no proper handling for bug endian environment.
There is a fix from pandas library maintainers for this issue.
https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/40116
Please find the link above and check if this resolves your issue.
Thanks,
Rajendra
Looking at those symbols, they all appear to come from libdmraid and
this appears to be an issue caused by dmraid (1.0.0.rc16-10)
Building in a sid chroot with libdmraid-dev_1.0.0.rc16-9_amd64.deb and
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16_1.0.0.rc16-9_amd64.deb makes the build succeed.
So I suspect this breakage
Control: reassign -1 libdmraid-dev
Control: found -1 1.0.0.rc16-10
Control: affects src:libblockdev
Reassigning accordingly.
Am 13.02.22 um 14:11 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Looking at those symbols, they all appear to come from libdmraid and
this appears to be an issue caused by dmraid
Source: ruby-gettext-i18n-rails-js
Version: 1.3.0+dfsg-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
* On 2/12/22 8:51 PM, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 06:51:26PM +0100, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> That's even better, then: it becomes a matter of documenting the
> procedure to bootstrap an rpm-based distro from Debian: I can test it
> and produce a draft HOWTO.
In the short term,
Source: libblockdev
Version: 2.26-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-pydot-ng
Version: 1.0.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: astap
Version: 0.9.588-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-css-tree
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: coq-hierarchy-builder
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: hypercorn
Version: 0.13.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Guilhem,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 09:57:29AM +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Control: notfixed -1 1.5.1+dfsg-1
> Control: found -1 1.5.1+dfsg-1
>
> Hi Salvatore!
>
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 at 09:47:28 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at
Hi Salvatore,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 07:11:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > […]
> > after upgrading a A20-OLinuXino-LIME2 board to bullseye, I had problems
> > with the
> > network interface which could be solved by preparing a tweaked u-boot (c.f.
> > [1]).
> > However, a few
Control: block -1 by 1005311 1005468 1005480
On 2022-02-10 07:10:33 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debia...@lists.debian.org, tjaal...@debian.org
>
> The upload of
Source: ruby2.7
Version: 2.7.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ruby/openssl/issues/369
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
| make -f
Source: ldns
Version: 1.7.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: bookworm sid
User: pkg-openssl-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-3.0
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/NLnetLabs/ldns/issues/135
Your package is failing to build using OpenSSL 3.0 with the
following error:
On Sat, 2022-02-12 at 10:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 11:00:46 +0100
> with message-id <8f91fa4c-7d72-e702-4091-104a21b38...@debian.org>
> and subject line Re: RFS: libfilezilla/0.36.0-2 -- build high-performing
> platform-independent
>
Control: retitle -1 hitori: FTBFS with Meson 0.61: ../data/meson.build:3:0:
ERROR: Function does not take positional arguments
On Sun, 13 Feb 2022 at 08:00:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ../data/meson.build:3:0: ERROR: Function does not take positional arguments.
This is the actual error
Source: iwyu
Version: 8.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: binutils-or1k-elf
Version: 1.0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apertium-eo-es
Version: 1:0.9.1~r60655-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-pt-gl
Version: 0.9.2~r57551-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: unison-2.51+4.11.1
Version: 2.51.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: apertium-is-sv
Version: 0.1.0~r76450-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-en-gl
Version: 0.5.2~r57551-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libvirt-python
Version: 7.9.0-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-hbs-mkd
Version: 0.1.0~r76450-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-kaz-tat
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: apertium-es-ast
Version: 1.1.0~r51165-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libjs-sdp
Version: 3.0.3+~2.14.1+~1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: tigervnc
Version: 1.12.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: ts-node
Version: 9.1.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: nheko
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> [ 52%] Building CXX
Source: apertium-oc-ca
Version: 1.0.6~r57551-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220212 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
